• Have something to say? Register Now! and be posting in minutes!

ESPN Future Power Rankings

ColinCoby

"Duff Man…Oh Yeah!"
8,493
28
48
Joined
Aug 10, 2010
Location
Sonoma County
Hoopla Cash
$ 1,351.63
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
21. Golden State Warriors | Future Power Rating: 512


PLAYERS MANAGEMENT MONEY MARKET DRAFT
243 (20th) 62 (24th) 97 (16th) 55 (12th) 55 (14th)



The new Warriors continue to look a lot like the old Warriors. Sure, they have a new coach and a few new faces, but they still have the same GM, the same flash with no substance on the court, and the same sort of 30-plus-win team we've seen for a while now. So their ranking stays right at No. 21 -- high enough to offer hope, but low enough to raise serious questions about ever achieving it.

The Warriors do have talent. Monta Ellis, Stephen Curry and David Lee are all solid building blocks. Brandon Rush was a nice pickup over the summer. And the team has high hopes for young players like Ekpe Udoh and Klay Thompson.

Unfortunately, the team remains woefully out of balance, lacking much in the way of a winning culture, a defensive ethic or a long-term strategy. It's hard to see how the Warriors will continue in the long term with Curry and Ellis in the backcourt. While they complement each other offensively, neither player is guarding anyone on defense. The team also still lacks size and shot-blocking in the middle after striking out on both Tyson Chandler and DeAndre Jordan this offseason.

Financially, the team has some flexibility, but not a lot. And they'll likely send their draft pick to the Jazz this year, limiting their ability to capitalize on a strong class. At virtually every level, the Warriors appear stuck, and it's unclear how they're going to break out of their rut.

(Previous rank: 21)
 

Heathbar012

Senioritis Member
4,024
2
0
Joined
Aug 20, 2010
Location
San Luis Obispo, CA
Hoopla Cash
$ 1,000.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
So... which one of you posters is writing for ESPN? Or is this situation that painfully obvious? Likely the latter. :sigh:
 
Top