- Thread starter
- #61
HurricaneDij39
Movin' On Forward
No analysis. Just blanket insults. Shocker.Nah, you have already shown that you're too stupid to have an actual discussion with.
So, what I'm going to do instead, is continue to clown you.
No analysis. Just blanket insults. Shocker.Nah, you have already shown that you're too stupid to have an actual discussion with.
So, what I'm going to do instead, is continue to clown you.
No analysis. Just blanket insults. Shocker.
if you had any sense of history you would see that there have been 2 big free agent signings by the Lakers in the past 30-40 years.....LeBron and Shaq.
Dude. LeBron will not allow his destination team to give up assets to get him. It should be a given that he has that kind of power.Sure, because the Lakers rarely have cap space and typically are reloading, not stripping down to rebuild. The big acquisitions have been via trade. If Lebron leaves and still wants to earn something reasonably close to his salary, it WILL be via trade. Same with AD.
Dude. LeBron will not allow his destination team to give up assets to get him. It should be a given that he has that kind of power.
Most likely he plays out his current deal with the Lakers (2024-25 option included) and take whatever money is available to play w/ Bronny, no lower than MLE though. Because the way he's talking, playing with his son will be a greater object to him than money at that point.Then he isn't going to get paid? He's also not going to a stripped out team.
Most likely he plays out his current deal with the Lakers (2024-25 option included) and take whatever money is available to play w/ Bronny, no lower than MLE though. Because the way he's talking, playing with his son will be a greater object to him than money at that point.
For those convinced Detroit had a better outlook than the Pacers...
Consider tonight justice in the playground. Plenty of missed opportunities for that franchise:
Good to see a blatant tanker fall on their ass.
- Drafted Killian over Haliburton.
- Declined OKC's offer of Giddey + SGA for Cade.
![]()
They have a better outlook than the Pacers because they are willing to tank.
That is the reason.
Didn’t work out this year, but they will still get a nice piece and likely another high pick next year.
Sam Hinkie has been out of a job for seven years, and there are more reasons for that than just one.They have a better outlook than the Pacers because they are willing to tank.
That is the reason.
Didn’t work out this year, but they will still get a nice piece and likely another high pick next year.
Sam Hinkie has been out of a job for seven years, and there are more reasons for that than just one.
It's time to move past that as a viable team-building mechanism.
Pistons suck and have for four years now.
I just don't understand why they didn't move Burks and/or Bog at the deadline. Might as well go all in...
You put OKC number 1 on your list and they’ve been tanking for years.Sam Hinkie has been out of a job for seven years, and there are more reasons for that than just one.
It's time to move past that as a viable team-building mechanism.
Pistons suck and have for four years now.
I think their plan was that this was the final tank year and it didn't pan out well. Bog and Burks are great pieces to build around.
Umm OKC actually tanked 2 seasonsYou put OKC number 1 on your list and they’ve been tanking for years.
Did they tank though?Umm OKC actually tanked 2 seasons
You said “for years” like they are a perineal offender like some of these teams. I’m sure I probably basically agree with your point, just had to set that straight.Did they tank though?
When things that are grouped with a number of two carry the plural “s”?
What did I say that was wrong?
Is 2 plural or no?You said “for years” like they are a perineal offender like some of these teams. I’m sure I probably basically agree with your point, just had to set that straight.
Ok man carry onIs 2 plural or no?