- Thread starter
- #1
Damn. A NT getting huge money.
Great player, however.
That's a lot of money tied up in DT'sWe don’t even play a NT? But they’ll line him up next to Fletcher Cox. I wouldn’t be surprised if they drafted another DLineman with their 1st pick.
That's a lot of money tied up in DT's
That's a lot of money tied up in DT's
Damn. A NT getting huge money.
Great player, however.
Actually he was playing out of position in PIT...mostly NT, but versatile enough to move outside to DE in their 34 front.
He's a true 3 down DT, perfect for a 43 front.
In the 34 scheme in PIT the NT comes off in nickel so they could never justify his money...many Steeler fans would've rather they kept Hargrave even if it meant shifting to a 43 front instead of Dupree.
I count myself among them.
Fully agree. I wanted to see a shift to 4-3 to retain him in Pitt. He's a piece to really build around.Actually he was playing out of position in PIT...mostly NT, but versatile enough to move outside to DE in their 34 front.
He's a true 3 down DT, perfect for a 43 front.
In the 34 scheme in PIT the NT comes off in nickel so they could never justify his money...many Steeler fans would've rather they kept Hargrave even if it meant shifting to a 43 front instead of Dupree.
I count myself among them.
That's a lot of money tied up in DT's
This but too bad Tomlin's ego won't let him change and not sure he would know how to change.
That's a lot of money tied up in DT's