- Thread starter
- #21
The team desperately needs shooters. So in that sense they don't need a true point guard but Simmons can't be on the floor all the time and they will need someone else to be a point.
Less money than what?
Less money than he could've gotten staying one more year.
Plus he paid the buyout a year earlier. With a lesser NBA salary coming in than what he'd have gotten next year.
And he's gonna come off the damn bench.
Bayless shot 44% from 3 last year, and Stauskas, in theory, should be a very good 3 point shooter. That's also why I'd like to see a front court line up of Saric, Simmons and Embiid/Okafor. Jerami Grant shouldn't be a starting SF in this league. He shot 24% from 3 last year. Simmons is going to create open shots. Need shooters, Saric can shoot it(40% from 3)
Bayless was a decent pickup but Stauskas hasn't shown anything yet. For Simmons to really play the point forward he is going to need some real snipers at the perimeter which the Sixers don't have.
Playing the 4 is relative to whom you're able to guard defensively. Offensively, of course Simmons best use will be as a primary ball handler, but you can't put him out there defensively as a PG. He's going to get eaten up and additionally, you'll take away from another great skill set he has which you mentioned, rebounding. Simmons skill set will thrive when guarded by 4's. If you put quicker guards on him, they'll be able to stay in front of him and limit his play making ability. Pair that with Simmons in-ability to shoot from the outside, and smaller guys will have a MUCH easier time guarding him. Even if another 4 plays off of him, Simmons is too quick and too good with the ball for those guys to stay in front of him when he attacks.
Draymond Greens best skill set offensively, is his ball handling and passing. But the reason he's so successful at it is because he plays the 4 and likewise is guarded by other 4's. If you made him the de-facto PG in the lineup, in addition to another big out there, you limit his ability because of quicker guys like PG's being able to recover on him.
I agree with this. I think they are going to need to take a hair cut on the player(s) they decide to move. No one they get market value because everyone knows they need to move players and none of the players have shown enough to work market value.
That's why I said, in theory, Stauskas should be a good 3 pt. shooter. He shot 44% from 3 in college for his career. I think he's a capable 3 pt. shooter, just hasn't shown it yet, but it's within his skill set to accomplish.
guys like Bogut, Livingston, and Iguadalo played crucial roles for the Warriors. Free agency isn't just about landing the super stars. It's about landing great role players as well.
20 win teams don't go to the playoffs.
He can pass over them. Magic never had a great shot and he's a HoFer.
Wasn't Iggy there before they got great? All it takes to land the mid-level guys is some money. It's already enticing to come play with Ben Simmons. Or at least it will be by next offseason.
No one can guard our bigs. Okafor needed to get double teamed already and that was with zero other capable players on the floor. How are they going to double Okafor with Simmons and Saric and Embiid out there?
No one can guard our bigs. Okafor needed to get double teamed already and that was with zero other capable players on the floor. How are they going to double Okafor with Simmons and Saric and Embiid out there?
You keep talking about the offensive side of the ball. I think you are unreasonably optimistic about how well all those guys will with each other offensively but let's say that it works. How would that team stop ANYONE?
Magic played in a completely different era. Kind of comparing apples and oranges.
Offensively his output could potentially be similar, but he gets additional advantages playing PF and using his quickness and athleticism against PF's rather than PGs.
From what I can tell, Saric is the only one of the 5 who can space the court. So if you play Okafor, Embiid, Saric and Simmons at the same time like @eaglesnut would like, they are so limited on the perimeter. Defenses would LOVE for that to happen. There would be 0 spacing on the court, unless your option was to make Saric a corner 3 point shooter.
You keep talking about the offensive side of the ball. I think you are unreasonably optimistic about how well all those guys will with each other offensively but let's say that it works. How would that team stop ANYONE?