If Wiggy can go through a non-heat related thread and not mentioned the Heat I'll be stunned.
It would probably break the interwebz if he did.
If Wiggy can go through a non-heat related thread and not mentioned the Heat I'll be stunned.
Rose needs to retire so that someone else who is not injury prone gets a chance. These teams need to do like the NFL that doesn't give guaranteed contracts to always injured players. It's ridiculous and an incredible waste of valuable resources
Rose needs to retire so that someone else who is not injury prone gets a chance. These teams need to do like the NFL that doesn't give guaranteed contracts to always injured players. It's ridiculous and an incredible waste of valuable resources
Ugh...Telfair, Bobby Brown are the only pg's and Dominique Jones and Jordan Crawford are the combo guards returning from China.
Nasty Nate by a mile.
funny coming from a lakers fan. kobe hasnt played a full season in like 3 years either. the difference is bulls still make the playoffs.
Ok, and how about any money the Bulls make off of Rose, like jersey sales, they should give it all away to a charity.
When teams start doing that, then I will agree with you.
I think partially guaranteed contracts is the way to go in the next CBA - or work out an agreement where the player and the NBA jointly purchases better insurance policies to cover their losses. So if Rose goes out on a season ending injury will happen next year - then instead of getting 20 million as scheduled he gets 10 million. As far as jersey sales - that is something that the players needs to address and have computed into their contracts separate from their salaries so that both are fair to both the NBA and the players
I dont think there is any issue with insurance. Do you doubt that the contracts ARE fully insured to protect the owners? I dont doubt for a minute that the bulls stop paying when he goes on long term injury. Thats the reason they support him doing it. They dont pay anymore for someone that would be doing no good.
No, a CBA deal needs to allow the cap room to be replaced to help the teams that lose the franchise player so the team continues to create revenue.
Pretty sure that insurance is paying all or most of Steve Nash's contract with the Lakers.
The point about allowing cap room to be replaced when a team loses a franchise player seems interesting. How would that work?
Maybe by percentages? Maybe they can do it like the amnesty on a yearly basis, just calling amnesty LTIR, except only effecting the cap hit so teams can go into the luxury zone without penalty. The player would remain on the team for the extent of the contract, but the year you deem the player Long term injury reserve can free up cap space so he can be replaced and cannot return to the roster.
I guess if it happened three weeks ago, the bulls could have got in on Dragic being an expiring deal.
Maybe teams that were not in the cap tax brackets can replace all the remaining salary, teams in the first step can replace 70% the salary without applying to the cap, teams that are constant violaters get to replace a third.
Its not impossible, sure there are other views. You cant go out and get LeBron James if the Cavs were willing to give him up because the following year your cap would be 100 million so one would need to be dealt.
I guess Hockey does it best with game by game cap. Problem is it does not extend into the playoffs.