- Thread starter
- #1
boogiewithstu2007
Well-Known Member
OH god here we go..... All over ESPN and the Luck lovers are insulted... Again Wilson can't be as good he's only 5.11 and has a better defense...
We just need to stop debating this
It's hard to debate IMO until Luck gets the caliber of team like Wilson has.
Both are really good young QB's
We just need to stop debating this
It's hard to debate IMO until Luck gets the caliber of team like Wilson has.
Both are really good young QB's
The OP wants this debate to go on or he wouldn't have started the thread.
Luck will most likely never have a team as good Seattle's. I have no problem with the debate, every debate in football can be dismissed as no two teams are exactly the same.
He doesn't need one to be just as good as Seattle but when he has a team that is considered Superbowl contenders then I would debate the 2.
Right now if you told me I had to pick Luck or Wilson to start a team ( not knowing how the rest of the roster would look), I would take Luck every single time
OK. Its your hypothetical team, you're free to do whatever you want with it.
I think most people would take Luck in that case. Just my opinion though
Could be wrong
We just need to stop debating this
It's hard to debate IMO until Luck gets the caliber of team like Wilson has.
Both are really good young QB's
Speculating about the future is just guesswork. Luck may turn into the next Peyton. He certainly has the ability.
But if you measure based on their actual play, it is pretty hard to argue that Luck has been better.
You see, I never see Colts/Luck fans try to argue his superiority to Russel Wilson. I don't know why Seahawk fans have such a massive inferiority complex when it comes to these two.