Look I admit the deflator thing is ridiculous. However, this is still Merica! Innocent until PROVEN guilty. As much as that bothers you it is what it is. Can you agree?
Otherwise, why would he destroy it????
Ok Little Pissed off about something. But first let me clear some things up?
1) I have never attempted a crime or been accused of one. My parents raised me and my brothers better then that
2) I'm still a loyal Seahawk fan till they place me 12 feet under
3) Remember in a whole bunch of different threads that i have high functioning autism
Now. I've been hearing alot of about the Cellphone. Let me tell you how easy it is to destroy 1(read number 1)
I would come home from work on the final day i worked for the week (I seem to recal it being a Saturday but not 100%) and Throw my work pants in the Laundry. Because of my disability i would forget to check for my cell phone. The laundry for the week always got done on Sunday. There were 2 times i would leave my phone in the pants pocket and it ran through the washer.
DEAD PHONE
That simple
Dirty pictures of Gisele he didn't want leaked?
Hey your SportsHoopla bank is looking good again hero
How many SportsHoopla loans have you gone through now?
derp
Que pasa?
I don't have autism and have left items in pants before washing them.
What was your post suppose to imply?
How Easy it is to destroy a cellphone. People who are not guilty can do it.
So why is everyone pointing to this as the lifeblood of his guilt????
How Easy it is to destroy a cellphone. People who are not guilty can do it.
So why is everyone pointing to this as the lifeblood of his guilt????
So it's just a coincidence that his phone was damaged and discarded shortly after the accusations came up?
OK
He admitted to intentionally stomping on it and giving it to his assistant to destroy.
That's kind of different than accidentally damaging a phone in the laundry.
This was a phone he only had a few months and destroyed it like the day he was supposed to meet with Wells.
And his assertion that he always did this? Well didn't he turn in two other phones and at least one was from well before that time? No, he saved those phones normally. He had more than one ffs. But THIS phone was destroyed right when this investigation happened.
Um, follow the link someone posted above in post #851. I'd bet you it has it. It was widely known. He never denied destroying the phone. His apologists simply say he did so because he was told it wasn't needed which isn't substantiated in any of the transcripts, but it helps them keep their denial up.Show me where he admitted it????
They happen from time to time
Um, follow the link someone posted above in post #851. I'd bet you it has it. It was widely known. He never denied destroying the phone. His apologists simply say he did so because he was told it wasn't needed which isn't substantiated in any of the transcripts, but it helps them keep their denial up.
I believe the destroyed cell phone would qualify as an indirect admission of guilt.......
Otherwise, why would he destroy it????