RavensNation2158
Active Member
The first bolded part.
1. It didn't go missing. He had it disposed of. His team asked if the league wanted it and they said no, so he chose to dispose of it.
2. The NFL has access to all the phone records and never needed the phone, hence they told his team they don't need it.
This is proof you haven't actually read any of the legal documents and are ignorant of the case at hand.
Second bolded part.
Further proof you have not read the legal documents of the case. Brady was fully cooperative, as admitted by the NFL.
The team turned over all employee phones to the league. (Brady's phone is privately owned.)
The team made their entire staff available to the league. The two sides agreed to a certain number of interviews per person. The league then decided it wanted to go over that limit and at that point were denied.
Maybe take the time to actually read the case so you don't look so dumb when commenting on it?
Did you read the whole report, or are you just going off of what you learned in the slanted NE media?
Legitimate question - not a job (mostly).