Brady Appeal Transcripts Are Out.

[NEPatsfan]

Just start reading by page 108 you will know Brady has acknowledged destroying phones is a common practice and he gave the phone to his assistant to be destroyed.

Hell I thought you might have already read the whole thing, maybe you only read the snowballs Brady's rep lob at him.

OK? And that proves he's lying how?

 

[NEPatsfan]

Here NE I'll help you out.
Tom Brady appeal of Deflategate suspension begins at NFL headquarters | abc7chicago.com

It's a common practice in disciplinary hearings for testimony to be under oath and to have the proceedings transcribed verbatim. While there is no legal penalty for lying in an NFL hearing, having the witnesses questioned under oath preserves a record of the proceedings in case the entire issue ends up in court.

And while you testify after being sworn in, you do so knowing you can be charged with perjury once the record is entered into a court. So the motivation to tell the truth is the same.

Anything else?

 

[Manster7588]

@NEPatsfan You better keep that burger flipping job. Lawyer is not in you future.

 

[NEPatsfan]

@NEPatsfan You better keep that burger flipping job. Lawyer is not in you future.

Maybe not, but based on your comments it's closer to being in view of my life as a profession than yours.

 

[NEPatsfan]

By the way @Manster7588, per your request I went back and read the portion you suggested proved TB lied about his phone. I'm not seeing it, can you please point to the page and line number you were referring was the proof of this? Thanks in advance.

 

[Manster7588]

And while you testify after being sworn in, you do so knowing you can be charged with perjury once the record is entered into a court. So the motivation to tell the truth is the same.

Anything else?

NO, NO, NO they cannot bring perjury charges if he lied in his appeal.

 

[Manster7588]

By the way @Manster7588, per your request I went back and read the portion you suggested proved TB lied about his phone. I'm not seeing it, can you please point to the page and line number you were referring was the proof of this? Thanks in advance.

He said it was common practice to destroy phones, yet he's had two previous ones he handed over. When did this practice begin, the day he was to meet Wells?

Sorry son he LIED.

 

[NEPatsfan]

NO, NO, NO they cannot bring perjury charges if he lied in his appeal.

Depends on if the deposition is entered into record.

Either way why is this minor semantic point so important to you?

And I'm still waiting for the page and line number where Brady lied according to you.

 

[NEPatsfan]

He said it was common practice to destroy phones, yet he's had two previous ones he handed over. When did this practice begin, the day he was to meet Wells?

Sorry son he LIED.

I'll go back and read it for a third time, but the first two times that is not what was exchanged.

 

[HaroldSeattle]

Started reading at page 104 and continued, wow a bunch of I don't remember from Brady. His whole testimony in those pages reek of lying dirtbag.

 

[Manster7588]

I give up. Can't reason with those in denial or are just plain stupid.

Like I said Brady better find a way to settle before August 12th.
I like Brady and think he's a 1st ballot HOF'r but he lied in this case and if he lies in court he could be charged federally.

 

[NEPatsfan]

Started reading at page 104 and continued, wow a bunch of I don't remember from Brady. His whole testimony in those pages reek of lying dirtbag.

Fair enough Harold, so then you'll agree using that standard Vincent is a "lying dirtbag"?

 

[NEPatsfan]

I give up. Can't reason with those in denial or are just plain stupid.

Like I said Brady better find a way to settle before August 12th.
I like Brady and think he's a 1st ballot HOF'r but he lied in this case and if he lies in court he could be charged federally.

I'll concede your point if you can direct me to the page and line number where he lies. I have now read it three times and he does not from what I can see.

 

[HaroldSeattle]

I'll concede your point if you can direct me to the page and line number where he lies. I have now read it three times and he does not from what I can see.

Let's start with him saying I don't remember.

 

[HaroldSeattle]

Fair enough Harold, so then you'll agree using that standard Vincent is a "lying dirtbag"?

Is Vincent on trial? No he's not, let's not deflect here.

 

[NEPatsfan]

Let's start with him saying I don't remember.

And that's definitive proof of him lying?

by the way when you get to Wells testimony, it becomes clear he is a self loving blowhard. His answers drag on, like he likes hearing himself speak. By comparison everyone else up to that point were answering short and to the point.

 

[NEPatsfan]

Is Vincent on trial? No he's not, let's not deflect here.

He's under the same sworn oath as Brady, therefore he is required to tell the truth under the same penalty of law.

 

[HaroldSeattle]

He's under the same sworn oath as Brady, therefore he is required to tell the truth under the same penalty of law.

Tell what pages and I'll read it tomorrow. Calling it a night.

 

[Manster7588]

I'll concede your point if you can direct me to the page and line number where he lies. I have now read it three times and he does not from what I can see.

1. Did he acknowledge it is his common practice to destroy old cell phones?
2. Did he provide two OLD cell phone to Wells?

So now I will accept your concedance.

 

[NEPatsfan]

Tell what pages and I'll read it tomorrow. Calling it a night.

At pg 281 he gives an answer that runs roughly 125 lines.

Goodnight