meh. I like guys that played like beasts in college. i watched several Georgia games and never noticed him. this guy looks like a combine star. hopefully he turns into a stud. who know?
They did it only because it was pretty well known the Giants were taking him at 10
There are certain packages where his position will act like a LB in our scheme. It's hard for me to say whether it's a good pick or not right now.I can't knock the kid b/c I've barely seen him play. Yes, S was a need, but leaving those 3 guys on the board, especially Lawson and Lee was puzzling to say the least.
It is a bit of a sore subject with me this morning. Bastards!
There are certain packages where his position will act like a LB in our scheme. It's hard for me to say whether it's a good pick or not right now.
No comment.Lynch looks like your pooorn guy night?
I realize that, but is he THAT GOOD?
The Bears are actually pretty stacked at LB. OLB was arguably our strongest position last year. I realize you can never have too many pass-rushers, but giving up a pick to move two spots...he better be good. As I stated, they could've stayed pat and blindly through a dart at the board and gotten a day-one starter at 11.
Floyd is a freak athlete but he's a bit lanky. He will probably need a year or two to bulk up before he makes a big impact.No.
I don't necessarily mind the player. I despise that we traded a 4th to move up 2 spots to get him.
In a draft where you could've thrown a dart at a top 10 big board and come away with a day-one, every down starter, we traded up to get a situational pass-rusher, at probably our most stacked position?
Kid better be the second coming of Lawrence fucking Taylor.
Floyd is a freak athlete but he's a bit lanky. He will probably need a year or two to bulk up before he makes a big impact.
Is it just me, or is Paxton Lynch essentially the same prospect Brock Osweiler was?
Osweiller doesn't look like he owns a pron video store. I think that's the main difference.