Are you happy with your teams first round pick?

[Used 2 B Hu]

Hold on a sec, lemme look it up...

Another DT??? WTF? I thought we was going for that Mackenzie doushbag? Need cornerbacks, bitches!

 

[Keystone]

Osweiller doesn't look like he owns a pron video store. I think that's the main difference.

Lynch looks like your pooorn guy night?

 

[Fountain City Blues]

FWIW, Coleman had the highest SPARQ score (tied with Doctson) among the WR's in the 1st round. From what I have watched, I think the Browns maybe got the best WR in the draft after all. They're really "winning" the draft so far.

 

[Tainthappening]

The scouting reports I've read on Kenny Clark suggest he is an undersized 4-3 DT who is better at rushing the passer than stopping the run and is not a good tackler. I'm not enthused about the fit.

I am happy (not excited) with the pick... more "splashier" options were avaiable, but I think this will be solid pick. From what I have read very good run stuffer.

 

[Used 2 B Hu]

FWIW, Coleman had the highest SPARQ score (tied with Doctson) among the WR's in the 1st round. From what I have watched, I think the Browns maybe got the best WR in the draft after all. They're really "winning" the draft so far.

Coleman will be awesome in Cleveland if they can find a guy to toss him the ball. I'm pulling for RGIII but they ain't exactly gonna be running the Baylor spread offense up there

 

[Across The Field]

This but I think Coleman is a hit or miss. He needs to improve on route running and get used to a regular system. We will see how long it takes him to adjust. He has the intangibles though. I do like the trades to get more picks but the Coleman pick was a reach IMO.

I don't disagree with him being a reach, but I doubt they would've gotten the Jets or Colts to move up, which is what they would've needed if they wanted him. He was their #1 WR, so I'm glad about that. I think he more than replaces Travis Benjamin, but they need to pair him up with at least one more really good WR and just let him lift lids all day.

 

[Fountain City Blues]

Moritz Boehringer, the German, really blew the doors off of scouts when they timed him along with other measurables. Kind of interested to see where he goes in this draft, if at all. He's the only WR in the draft with a SPARQ score over 140.

 

[ATL96Steeler]

I have to say I wasn't expecting Atlanta to target a safety especially with Darron Lee, Shaq Lawson, Kevin Dodd, and a few other guys still on the board. I don't know much about Keanu Neal other than he makes poor choices since he went to Florida.

I can't knock the kid b/c I've barely seen him play. Yes, S was a need, but leaving those 3 guys on the board, especially Lawson and Lee was puzzling to say the least.

 

[ATL96Steeler]

Is it just me, or is Paxton Lynch essentially the same prospect Brock Osweiler was?

Maybe, but will cost a TON less...good move imo by the Broncos.

 

[Broncos6482]

 

[Across The Field]

Maybe, but will cost a TON less...good move imo by the Broncos.

I agree, on both drafting Lynch and letting Osweiler go sign that absurd deal with Houston.

 

[RP-29]

I am happy (not excited) with the pick... more "splashier" options were avaiable, but I think this will be solid pick. From what I have read very good run stuffer.

My main concern is with an undersized lineman playing over center in the 3-4; especially with not much help at ILB. GB's D will get hammered on runs between the tackles. If he gets groomed as a 3-4 DE ala Mike Daniels, I'll probably feel better about the pick.

 

[beardown07]

No.


I don't necessarily mind the player. I despise that we traded a 4th to move up 2 spots to get him.



In a draft where you could've thrown a dart at a top 10 big board and come away with a day-one, every down starter, we traded up to get a situational pass-rusher, at probably our most stacked position?



Kid better be the second coming of Lawrence fucking Taylor.

 

[Tharvot]

I was surprised they went Coleman instead of Treadwell, but I like the position pick and really like the trades.

 

[ATL96Steeler]

Happy? No.

Unhappy? No.

The Steelers needed a buncha stuff...CB, S, DT, OLB, ILB, but what they were not looking for at 25 was a starter unless the guy just overwhelmed in camp and knock a vet off the job.

6 back end def players went off the board before 25 and I guess Colbert and MT thought that run would continue in the 2nd rd so they took the best available at a need position.

The good...my top DTs are still on the board, and the S crop starts to look very similar after Bell.

 

[DirtDirtDirt]

No.


I don't necessarily mind the player. I despise that we traded a 4th to move up 2 spots to get him.



In a draft where you could've thrown a dart at a top 10 big board and come away with a day-one, every down starter, we traded up to get a situational pass-rusher, at probably our most stacked position?



Kid better be the second coming of Lawrence fucking Taylor.

They did it only because it was pretty well known the Giants were taking him at 10

 

[podsox]

meh. I like guys that played like beasts in college. i watched several Georgia games and never noticed him. this guy looks like a combine star. hopefully he turns into a stud. who know?

 

[DirtDirtDirt]

meh. I like guys that played like beasts in college. i watched several Georgia games and never noticed him. this guy looks like a combine star. hopefully he turns into a stud. who know?

That was my concern, i never like seeing "Underachieved" attached to a 1st round pick

 

[mcnabb7542]

 

[ATL96Steeler]

This but I think Coleman is a hit or miss. He needs to improve on route running and get used to a regular system. We will see how long it takes him to adjust. He has the intangibles though. I do like the trades to get more picks but the Coleman pick was a reach IMO.

On paper he was a reach...but, taking the 1st WR off the board...you know they got THEIR guy...with a boatload of picks I'm curious to see what they do the rest of the draft.