MiamiVice
Well Liked Member
I wouldn't say that. In fact. I would say they are pretty much on par with each other.He'll be a lot more productive that what we've got.
And you know this, maign.
I wouldn't say that. In fact. I would say they are pretty much on par with each other.He'll be a lot more productive that what we've got.
And you know this, maign.
Yan Gomes is a bum dude.
Good luck with that bum.Well, he's a catcher, so 135 games is pretty good.
Prior to his injury last year, he carried a slash line of .275/.318/.463/.781, hardly an "average hitter" and certainly not for a catcher. In 840 PAs with the Indians before getting injured, his slash was .284/.325/.476/.801 - that's really nice production from C.
So there is reason to think he could offer improvement to the RS with a healthy and productive season.
McCann is going to bat 8th... his bat is basically meaningless to the Tigers.. Their 1-6 is so much better than the Indians.. its not even debatable. To be honest. C may be the only position you end up with better offensive stats when compared to the Tigers.Yes, but we should jerk off over James McCann.
I wouldn't say that. In fact. I would say they are pretty much on par with each other.
yeah... Gomes is really lighting the world on fire there.. totally worth those extra 40 runs.Career Slash
JM - .264/.296/.385/.681
YG - .262/.303/.442/.746
Yep, totally "on par."
yeah... Gomes is really lighting the world on fire there.. totally worth those extra 40 runs.
Seriously though Slinky.. good luck with that shit. At least you had a projection in the preseason that said your offense was going to be good to hang your hat on.
Yeah.. and McCann was a rookie last year.. so that probably means he will improve.. as he is only 25.Well, his career numbers obviously include his injured season, so there is that.
Another thing that you might want to consider regarding those 40 mysterious runs that BP's come up with is the unfortunate sequencing of Indians' hitting last year.
Yeah.. and McCann was a rookie last year.. so that probably means he will improve.. as he is only 25.
LOL.. More PECTOA.. did they project anything right last year?Not necessarily. His production last year was on par with his minors numbers. PECTOA doesn't project improvement. Regression, actually.
Another thing that you might want to consider regarding those 40 mysterious runs that BP's come up with is the unfortunate sequencing of Indians' hitting last year.
LOL.. More PECTOA.. did they project anything right last year?
lol..... I don't care.. I will take any bet you want to make regarding the Indians scoring 714 runs this year. If you want to do anything with it I will take it. $100, $1k, avatar (for queers), any bet you want to make.. The Indians are not going to score that many runs and I will bet anything on that.Vice has ignored this part as he frantically googles "hit sequencing."
Refering to Baseball Prospectus projections for a player in the preseason like it means something is like going to a psychic... actually I think psychics are more accurate.
I could care less if its the most accurate system.. that is like saying you are the smartest retard. None of them project anything at any reasonably accurate rate. An 80 yr old named Miss Nancy with a turbin on her head would be more accurate.PECOTA? Yes, for sure. It is the most accurate player projection system available to the public. I'm not surprised you don't know that.