- Thread starter
- #1
bluepigpen
Well-Known Member
Kemp has already said he is not a 4th outfielder, but can he start or stay healthy? Crawford is taking the high road, what should happen guys?
The Dodgers will eventually have to trade one of them, except for Puig. Who they trade for will depend on the need at the time of any such trade.
If one of them goes, it should be Crawford. No doubt he's overpaid and the Dodgers would have to kick in a few millions to offset his overvalue. Kemp has too much upside. If Kemp gets to 80% of what he used to be, it'll be better than 100% of crawford going forward.
The Mariners signed Cano to a huge contract, so they're spenders. Cano took over David Ackley's starting spot. Ackley is now listed as their starting left fielder. They also signed Corey who's coming off surgery and sat out a year. His availability in the outfield is limited. This is where Crawford would fit in the Mariner's scheme.
The deal would be Crawford + 5mil/yr cash (20 mil overall) for Ackley + Edwin Diaz RHP (#5) or Vicor Sanchez RHP (#7) + Tyler Marlette C (#8) or Danny Hultzen LHP (#10) Only Hultzen is close to the Majors (AAA) the others are rookie league or A.
Ackley (.250 BA) could serve the team similar to Punto/Schumaker although he still needs work in the OF. And he's cheap. If/when one of the big 3 OF goes down, Ackley can step in.
Crawford stayed healthy and played well last year, if anyone is overpaid it's Ethier. Ethier had 1 good half of a season and that's been about it. I want to keep all 4 with Crawford, Puig and Kemp as the starters, speed and power all the way.
Ethier and Crawford are both overpaid. Crawford is overpaid worse than Ethier is. Also, Crawford did not actually stay healthy last year. He only played in 116 games, which is i guess an improvement from playing zero games for the Dodgers in 2012. But still, he wasn't 100%. I hope for better from Crawford this year. An argument can easily be made that Ethier was more valuable to the Dodgers than Crawford was last year.
Ethier: .340 wOBA, 120 wRC+ in 142 games.
Crawford: .322 wOBA, 108 wRC+ in 116 games.
Also, since you said you wanted "speed and power" all the way, I think its only fair to mention that Ethier had a better slugging percentage than Crawford. So yeah, Crawford is speedier but Ethier easily has him beat in the power department.
Ethier and Crawford are both overpaid. Crawford is overpaid worse than Ethier is. Also, Crawford did not actually stay healthy last year. He only played in 116 games, which is i guess an improvement from playing zero games for the Dodgers in 2012. But still, he wasn't 100%. I hope for better from Crawford this year. An argument can easily be made that Ethier was more valuable to the Dodgers than Crawford was last year.
Ethier: .340 wOBA, 120 wRC+ in 142 games.
Crawford: .322 wOBA, 108 wRC+ in 116 games.
Also, since you said you wanted "speed and power" all the way, I think its only fair to mention that Ethier had a better slugging percentage than Crawford. So yeah, Crawford is speedier but Ethier easily has him beat in the power department.
I expect Crawford to have a better season than last and I agree that we should see him running more. Hopefully he can play more and add some power over and above last year.
Ethier and Crawford are both overpaid. Crawford is overpaid worse than Ethier is. Also, Crawford did not actually stay healthy last year. .
Crawford batting leadoff last year: .304/.353/.432
Very good numbers