- Thread starter
- #441
Schmoopy1000
When all else fails, Smack em' in the Mouth!
well if he didnt sign it so be it.I did not like that he was tagged so if they cave,it will be another mistake. I would let him hold out
well if he didnt sign it so be it.I did not like that he was tagged so if they cave,it will be another mistake. I would let him hold out
I don't think he'll hold out, because it keeps him in the same boat next season. If he plays and plays well he can push his salary up, off of the 2nd tag, or be a FA.I did not like that he was tagged so if they cave,it will be another mistake. I would let him hold out
hopefully our rookie or other newbies shows up & we can avoid a big contract next year.I hate taking the side of "management " but needing to see another season before doing something long term is an absolute must do.
I see a guy who can't or won't block while well over 50% of his catches were schemed open.
If some team wants to make him highest paid TE then let him walk after the season . We need the money for higher priority,Diggs,Parsons,Lamb.. I like ths Wisconsin TEI hate taking the side of "management " but needing to see another season before doing something long term is an absolute must do.
I see a guy who can't or won't block while well over 50% of his catches were schemed open.
RIP Perk.RIP Don Perkins…
I got a feeling that Schultz plays under the tag and then is gone next season. Or maybe I am hoping. He is just not worth the money. He sucks at blocking. He is a good receiver though. Ferguson would be a good cheap replacement. They need to use Schults money on the lines.Schultz is at camp.
Cowboys TE Schultz at camp after skipping OTAs
After skipping voluntary camp due to a contract dispute, Cowboys tight end Dalton Schultz did report to mandatory minicamp.www.google.com
Agree, Shultz is very good but not franchise $$$ good.I got a feeling that Schultz plays under the tag and then is gone next season. Or maybe I am hoping. He is just not worth the money. He sucks at blocking. He is a good receiver though. Ferguson would be a good cheap replacement. They need to use Schults money on the lines.
Agree, on Schultz, I have no judgment on Ferguson now, but I like what I've heard from camp.The system made Shultz more than his talent.
Besides, Ferguson is much more my kinda TE
To be clear, I have only a judgement of his size and his reputation of being a hard worker. I prefer TE's with oline mentality more so than what Schultz shows.Agree, on Schultz, I have no judgment on Ferguson now, but I like what I've heard from camp.
I think Ferguson could develop,but only if Schultz eventually leaves. This team is real good at drafting TE,claiming they are going to use 12 personell, then never do it. The Fasano and Bennet picks were wastes. at least in this case they used a 4th. I think Ferguson can be a #1 TE and red zone threat.To be clear, I have only a judgement of his size and his reputation of being a hard worker. I prefer TE's with oline mentality more so than what Schultz shows.
I believe this is Shultz' last year here. We wont go back to back tags on a TE. We wont pay the amount he will think he is worth at ends year either.I think Ferguson could develop,but only if Schultz eventually leaves. This team is real good at drafting TE,claiming they are going to use 12 personell, then never do it. The Fasano and Bennet picks were wastes. at least in this case they used a 4th. I think Ferguson can be a #1 TE and red zone threat.