- 172,270
- 53,405
- 1,033
- Joined
- Jun 26, 2014
- Location
- Still stuck here in Nashville
- Hoopla Cash
- $ 609,191.14
Fuck you.This will be the year, he just needs more corners mixed in
Fuck you.This will be the year, he just needs more corners mixed in
another Westbrook? I guess other than being an efficient scorer and not the passer he is, sure.Sexton is just another Westbrick imo
Utah will be worse next year, i guarantee it
You have been a little hostile latelyFuck you.
I can agree with that. star...not a superstar. If he is your best player not sure how far you can go. For the cavs to be a title contender, most likely Mobley will need to become our best player.Mitchell is not a superstar, in my opinion
I will give you this one.You keep saying this but he was helping us win in the short time he played before his injury. I mean, they didn't win much before last season but they also did not have Mobley or LM. Love was usually hurt. 2 years prior Garland was among the worst players in the NBA. Also no Allen until after the 2020-21 season started.
In addition, he's an efficient shooter. Just say you don't like the kid....no reason to make things up about him that are factually incorrect.
It's not a lock it can work. Will be compared, I'm sure, to Lillard/CJ in Portland. Though maybe that would have worked better had they had Mobley and allen in the front court.Yeah I don’t know about this one. Mitchell and Garland both seem ball dominant.
I can agree with that. star...not a superstar. If he is your best player not sure how far you can go. For the cavs to be a title contender, most likely Mobley will need to become our best player.
He's not your best player.I can agree with that. star...not a superstar. If he is your best player not sure how far you can go. For the cavs to be a title contender, most likely Mobley will need to become our best player.
He is....but question will be is he better than Sexton, LM, Agbaji and what all those picks become.Sexton is not a superstar.
Mitchell is better than Sexton
Try it for a year or 2, if it doesn't?It's not a lock it can work. Will be compared, I'm sure, to Lillard/CJ in Portland. Though maybe that would have worked better had they had Mobley and allen in the front court.
as a guard he makes about 47% overall and 37% from 3 but he cannot shoot?No he wasn't. Check his true shooting % and his true 3 pt % along with his PER. Not good. Sexton is an energy player who hustles, and like westbrick, eventually that doesn't work.
Now that Mitchell is gone, let's discuss how big of a failure that Utah group was
Garland-Mobley would have been a nice 1-2 punch long term.....I guess Altman felt like he had to shoot his shot since the Cavs play in the loaded EC.I can agree with that. star...not a superstar. If he is your best player not sure how far you can go. For the cavs to be a title contender, most likely Mobley will need to become our best player.
agree with the last part but is $18 mil per really such an overpay? Hell, Brunson and Simons just got $25-26 mil per.No.
He's definitely BETTER.
But, they obviously overpaid.
Me personally, I would rather have Mitchell on a max.
I just would not give that kinda money to Sexton.
If they didn't, they would lose him for nothing.
Again: Overpay.
I'm not being a dick here...
But, it's Cleveland.
Starts weren't lining up to go there when they had Lebron.
So, they have to do what they have to in order to land a guy of Mitchell's caliber....even if he isn't a Superstar.
Yeah....concede.That is the exact mindset he had with Gobert. Perhaps in the playoffs everyone will blame the wrong people again and Mitchell can keep skating by on half a game.
Are they as big a failure as the Nets last season?
Well he would of improved the KnicksMitchell is not a superstar, in my opinion