Tai Chi≈Surfing
Phenom~Vet~HOFer
- 107,903
- 22,860
- 1,033
- Joined
- Jul 2, 2013
- Hoopla Cash
- $ 147,976.58
Again?Can we get a wellness check on Pasta?
Might be having a stroke.
Again?Can we get a wellness check on Pasta?
Might be having a stroke.
Dinwiddie would be really good on the Clippers.I’m looking at pgs who might be available this summer for you guys
Rozier
Dinwiddie
Lowry
Fultz
Not great
Mostly using Morris and bones plus your late first this year as a general idea for what you can offer
Obviously would need more for rozier
Punches might be thrown when the Lakers face off the Clippers.Yep, end of the day, everyone knows who Russ is, including Lebron. For some reason, Lebron thought they could make it work.
Especially Ham.I know you love Westbrook but that's just flat out wrong. They wanted him on the team. Went out of there way to accommodate him for months, tried to keep him engaged and make it work. He also earned his share of the blame too because A) He was very resistant to changing to fit (especially the first year) and B) He did play poorly, sometimes extremely poorly to the point where even respected NBA analysts were like "He's gonna be out of the league soon if he doesn't turn it around". Did he deserve ALL of the blame? No. But what you said isn't true either
1 game?I will agree on that.
But also, Donovan Mitchell had 70 and I don’t see anybody trying to call him a superstar.
Of course Lillard is better.
But 1 game is 1 game no matter how brilliant.
I've already said Lillard's was more impressive but I will say, the Cavs needed every single point from Mitchell to win. He saved the game for them in regulation, he willed them to that victory and he did it against Chicago. Lillard did it against Houston. I still say it was more impressive though. Portland was up by double digits basically for most of the game. They were up by like 18 with 4 mins to go when he had a little over 60. They didn't need to keep him in the game. Mitchell also had to do it in OT but unlike Lillard he had to be out there.Mitchell's 70 was cheap, he got OT that shouldn't have even taken place lol.
Cue Cleveland fans rebuttals starting........now?
He’s a great player languishing in a small market with a team that is going nowhere. Not sure how you can actually be a “super star” under that circumstance.I've already said Lillard's was more impressive but I will say, the Cavs needed every single point from Mitchell to win. He saved the game for them in regulation, he willed them to that victory and he did it against Chicago. Lillard did it against Houston. I still say it was more impressive though. Portland was up by double digits basically for most of the game. They were up by like 18 with 4 mins to go when he had a little over 60. They didn't need to keep him in the game.
Efficiency wise Lillard had the most impressive 70+ in NBA history.
Rethinking that superstar list. I would put Lillard as a superstar, borderline but he is a still a superstar as of right now.
I've already said Lillard's was more impressive but I will say, the Cavs needed every single point from Mitchell to win. He saved the game for them in regulation, he willed them to that victory and he did it against Chicago. Lillard did it against Houston. I still say it was more impressive though. Portland was up by double digits basically for most of the game. They were up by like 18 with 4 mins to go when he had a little over 60. They didn't need to keep him in the game. Mitchell also had to do it in OT but unlike Lillard he had to be out there.
Efficiency wise Lillard had the most impressive 70+ in NBA history.
Rethinking that superstar list. I would put Lillard as a superstar, borderline but he is a still a superstar as of right now.
He’s a great player languishing in a small market with a team that is going nowhere. Not sure how you can actually be a “super star” under that circumstance.
I would like to see those stats for some of those other given superstars like Luka and Jokic. Defense definitely hurts Lillard, a bit easier to focus on your offense when you don't play any defense.I read a stat the other day that said dame was in the 99th percentile of offensively but the bottom 5 percentage defensively
Just a pro tip. It’s out of bounds to talk about Jokic’s defense.I would like to see those stats for some of those other given superstars like Luka and Jokic. Defense definitely hurts Lillard, a bit easier to focus on your offense when you don't play any defense.
Hey...I'm not saying he is a bad defender just picked the two superstars that don't play top level defense. Guys like Giannis, Embiid and Tatum are strong defenders and are also known for their defense. I would imagine both are near average not bottom 5 like Dame.Just a pro tip. It’s out of bounds to talk about Jokic’s defense.
He’s a great player languishing in a small market with a team that is going nowhere. Not sure how you can actually be a “super star” under that circumstance.
Not even close. The Sixers are a top 5 team in the league. Portland is fighting for a play in spot.Embiid doing the same, but in a larger market.
Not even close. The Sixers are a top 5 team in the league. Portland is fighting for a play in spot.
Wouldn’t that make them a top 8 team in the league?The Sixers are the same 2nd round exit they always are.