DALLAScornhusker
Well-Known Member
In the case above (weighing Chaisson or pass) we take the player every time. When that player and more targets graded similarly are gone, you turn attention toward the next group and decide how far to move back. You don't ever stand still and take the lower graded player (reach). That is when you end up drafting a Taco - or more in line with this situation - a Felix Jones (Baun) to use as a specialist when there are plenty of good full time players on the board. If you didn't already have a solid RB like Barber III (LVE and Smith), then the pick wouldn't hurt so bad because he'll be counted on more and play a high %.I agree. if we are talking one particular guy we want. if we have 4 or 5 guys we legit like graded the same & we move back 7 or 8 spots. I am cool with that kind of gamble.
Otherwise I am always leary of getting to cute, if the guy we are targeting is there at our pick.
I'll pony up 17 for a guy who has a legit chance at being a pro bowler as an OLB and could transition into a down DE on 3rd down and maybe grow into his frame to become a permanent weak side DE in the future.
I won't do the same for an OLB with a little weaker pass rush traits but also size/skill limitations that keep him at one position as a stand up Sam.