lasgop8
Lets do this!
Because they have stars and our players to them are depth guys not main players.I saw that. What's with the Pens taking all of our former players these days? They are checking in on Laughton now as well.
Because they have stars and our players to them are depth guys not main players.I saw that. What's with the Pens taking all of our former players these days? They are checking in on Laughton now as well.
Laughton on the phone the morning.......
View attachment 268689
Not sure I would consider Jeff Carter a depth guy? But yea I can see them going after Laughton for this reason.Because they have stars and our players to them are depth guys not main players.
Yea I see only Vegas giving them any trouble in the West. They def have all the pieces now.@Chris p Baconhas to be thrilled with the Avs building a stud roster. Dubnyk may just put them over the top to win it all. I just don't see any weaknesses on their roster now. Avs vs TB would be an entertaining series.
Jeff Carter has been a depth guy for several years nowNot sure I would consider Jeff Carter a depth guy? But yea I can see them going after Laughton for this reason.
I have seen a few reports of Patrick being moved. I hate that idea 100%. He's only 24 years old. He missed a majority of last season due to migraines. Lastly, he was the #2 overall pick two years ago and we would take a major loss on any return on him being that's he's struggling getting back to form. If Fletcher trades him, I'll lose my shit on this franchise. Agree with you on Laughton.Dreger just tweeted teams think Laughton will re-sign with the Flyers rather than be moved. I'll be honest, I really don't like that. Opportunity for some cap flexibility to make a move that you need to make (ie top 4 dman). Spending it on a bottom 6 forward, even if you like him, isn't smart to me.
I have seen a few reports of Patrick being moved. I hate that idea 100%. He's only 24 years old. He missed a majority of last season due to migraines. Lastly, he was the #2 overall pick two years ago and we would take a major loss on any return on him being that's he's struggling getting back to form. If Fletcher trades him, I'll lose my shit on this franchise. Agree with you on Laughton.
If he's dealt, it better be for a proven #1 dman.I hate the idea of moving Patrick too. You're just not going to get good value for him. He's absolutely struggled this year, but he's got the highest ceiling right now. Maybe he doesn't pan out, but making that call right now is a bad idea IMO.
If he's dealt, it better be for a proven #1 dman.
I would pursue a Seth Jones trade during the offseason.Agreed. If there's a top young player with the potential to be a #1 dman, i'm good with that. Or if he's the centerpiece of getting an established #1 dman, I'm OK with it.
If it's for a guy in his prime that you're hoping can be a top pair guy but is on a mediocre contract; which is what a Patrick trade screams to me, then no thank you.
Laughton signed $3 million per for 5 seasons. I'm fine with that. He's only just turning 27 late next month.
I would pursue a Seth Jones trade during the offseason.
he has 2 years remaining on his contract. I would be locked in on how his negotiations are going on resigning. He may not want to resign in Cbus?There's lots of chatter about Jones, but honestly, why would CBJ deal him? He's only 26, he's a top pair RHD, does it all. He's the kind of guy you re-build around, not one you trade to start a rebuild. At least, IMO.
I would try to make a move for him in a heart beat, but I just don't see why CBJ would.