dtgold88
Well-Known Member
Almost agree 100%. Might say something like 45-49 for Cs as only slight differenceLakers = under (I see them between 50-55 wins).
Celtics = over (48-53 wins).
Cavs = push (they'll be right there at like 23-27 wins).
Almost agree 100%. Might say something like 45-49 for Cs as only slight differenceLakers = under (I see them between 50-55 wins).
Celtics = over (48-53 wins).
Cavs = push (they'll be right there at like 23-27 wins).
You are the one who keeps bringing it up and did so again. Others will take your side if I say the sun rises is the East and you disagree. Especially as a newbie.Okay after this comment respond if need be. But it's time we let this one go once & for all. Time for a different topic. Others that saw the same thing & knew exactly what I meant. It was only you that took it outta context because it went against what you thought.
No assumption was needed. I explicitly told you we play many teams from the Bmore schedule in the second half. Kind of self explanatory.i was supposed to assume where you coming from, somehow automatically...
and when i wonder why on God's green Earth you throw in Baltimore, you decided to get on your high horse, as always ...
the fact i have to explain this to you AT ALL is comical...
Played each other once and Baker won. Just sayin'.
I think LA could get to 57 just think between possible load management from Lebron, AD injury history, and Lebron not really caring much about his playoff seeding I just don't see them winning that many.
I cannot gauge the Cs either but maybe no Kyrie helps....not like we are talking 50s.
I really don't know either with Cavs. A lot of young guys/rookies. New coach. Potential tanking to keep pick.
And when I said you never argue with wiggy I stand by that. Because I've never seen you disagree with him about anything. Only give whatever he says a thumbs up.
Darnold didn't play in that one...just sayin'.
Yep, i'm with you on that one.
No assumption was needed. I explicitly told you we play many teams from the Bmore schedule in the second half. Kind of self explanatory.
Great...it was last season. And Baker came in cold with his team down more than 1 score.Darnold didn't play in that one...just sayin'.
this comment I made says so - "Ask Bmore...they've had success against the teams on our 2nd half schedule.....but lost to the Browns at home."if you say so...![]()
Great...it was last season. And Baker came in cold with his team down more than 1 score.
They've only faced each other once. Baker won. This isn't an opinion."last season"...
good job, ol' sock...![]()
this comment I made says so - "Ask Bmore...they've had success against the teams on our 2nd half schedule.....but lost to the Browns at home."
They've only faced each other once. Baker won. This isn't an opinion.
Great...it was last season. And Baker came in cold with his team down more than 1 score.
Over/under 57 wins for your Lakers?
Over/under 46 wins for my Celtics?
Over/under 25 wins for the Cavs?
since they've only faced off last season seems like the only worthy head-to-head to have brought up.ok, show of hands from folks who care about last season...
anyone...?![]()
There's something wrong with that fella. He wants me to own something I've yet to see him do. Does that make any sense? Anyway season's getting closer. You excited to see your new-look Lakers? And what's up with AD's thumb, any news? Obviously I haven't checked.
OK, but only time they have faced off....and Baker won.Which has nothing to do with this season.