Yes, of course... but you're missing the context of the conversation there.
We were talking specifically about the long term draft considerations that the Lakers conceded to the Pelicans.
An injury to Davis, and those become very much a big deal.
So... should Pelinka have conceded as many of those as he did? Did he really have to considering the fact that other potential suitors for AD were balky and unwilling to fully commit? I think those are legitimate questions.
Said as much about Lebron and NE Ohio......though without Kyrie there ironic, huh?) and assurances from Gilbert he'lll spend (and having seen it in action) he does not come back. Lebron went to the Lakers with assurances only of it being in LA.This could be said about any team and star player. If Lebron wasn't from NE Ohio and didn't promise Cavs fans a title, does he return to the Cavs.
Guys like Kyrie, KD, Kawhi, etc. leaving there current teams are all considered to be very strong possibilities. Do we think that any of them are going someplace they don't want to go to?
Only issue that is rare is few if any parameters around the picks.But folks only want to claim it was mistake when it was Pelinka with that line of thinking.
I mean...Not missing anything. When players at AD's level are in the trade, long term draft considerations aren't unusual. They may not necessarily be common, but they are not unusual.
People want to paint this like the Lakers had all of the leverage, they didn't. They had more leverage than the Pels because of teams backing off, but they didn't all of the leverage or even more by a wide margin.
The Lakers HAD to get that deal done. That is a different level of pressure. They were also dealing with a team that may have preferred dealing with someone else. So they had to be pretty careful in their approach.
I'm not saying you, but I find it funny that many of the same people who were saying that the Lakers weren't getting AD, are now trying to say they somehow overpaid to get him.
Yet, if they hadn't gotten him, Pelinka and the Lakers would be getting crushed by everyone as having fucked up again.
Much of the criticism seems to mainly be people who had a lot of "hot takes" that don't look so "hot" anymore.
gotta admit that's the 1st time i've heard that slant...
I mean...
Davis was on a 1 year contract....was demanding to go to the Lakers....Davis refused to go to the Celtics, who mostly dropped out of the bidding, Durant's injury took the Knicks out of making a major offer.....
I just dont see where any other kind of significant offer comes from other than LA. That was their leverage.
Usually when a super-star gets traded the trador usually gets 50 cents on the dollar. This time, with a guy on a 1 year deal, with no other major offers from other teams, Griffin got a ton.
The Pelicans may have preferred to deal with someone else, but who is that team? With the circumstances the other 2 teams that made any sense, the Celtics and Knicks, became non-factors.
Kyrie to nets a lock
I'm talking about the draft considerations that run all the way to 2024 possibly '25.
The rumors of stars willing to take the minimum to come here will be insane........Cannot wait.
oh I think the same. it's just that everyone and his brother seems to think the Lakers are in the running to grab him...
Right... if it all works out, it will all work out.Again, if all works out for the Lakers, those are end of the round picks. They get a 1st in 2021 (top 8 protected, then unprotected in 2022), right to swap picks in 2023, and can choose either the 2024 or 2025 1st round pick (I think?, I've seen reports where it's just the a regular pick swap in 2025 and a 1st in 2024). Think two more Moe Wagners, or if you're luckly Kyle Kuzmas. It's a crap shoot that late in the first.
I don't necessarily disagree.shop said:Of course, if it all blows up in the Lakers faces, they'll only have every other 1st though 2025 to right the ship. For AD they would always take that chance.
I mean...
Davis was on a 1 year contract....was demanding to go to the Lakers....Davis refused to go to the Celtics, who mostly dropped out of the bidding, Durant's injury took the Knicks out of making a major offer.....
I just dont see where any other kind of significant offer comes from other than LA. That was their leverage.
Usually when a super-star gets traded the trador usually gets 50 cents on the dollar. This time, with a guy on a 1 year deal, with no other major offers from other teams, Griffin got a ton.
The Pelicans may have preferred to deal with someone else, but who is that team? With the circumstances the other 2 teams that made any sense, the Celtics and Knicks, became non-factors.
Right... if it all works out, it will all work out.
The issue is the risk of it not working out, and the open question as to whether Pelinka had to concede so much... particularly way down the line.
I don't necessarily disagree.
Especially because the Lakers have an aging LeBron right now... they got to capitalize right now.
Just trying to point out that Pelinka is getting a little too much mid-stream praise here... the job isn't done yet, for starters... and for another thing he has given up a lot just to get this far.
Just trying to point out that Pelinka is getting a little too much mid-stream praise here... the job isn't done yet, for starters... and for another thing he has given up a lot just to get this far.
It's still difficult actually seeing Kawhi pick the Lakers, just doesn't seem like a move he would make imo.
I think that pretty much leaves DLo. We are hearing buzz about the Suns or Twolves but why would he want to go to any of those teams, lets be honest.
I think the mix of role players idea is out the window as well, they didn't clear cap space to pay role players, they did it to sign 1. max guy ($32M) 2. A 2nd tier max guy, which only leaves DLo.