TurnUpTheHeat
Well-Known Member
You only had one job to do......
https://www.google.com/imgres?imgur...K_jAhUprlkKHSXXAkQQMwhRKAQwBA&iact=mrc&uact=8
This is true......Cannot recall many who spurned max deals from their own team before Lebron did.
But you ignore the idea Lebron was hardly ever here with room for a stud FA. Only time they had cap space with him when asked by potential FAs he would not tell them he would stay.Of course not.
But also consider that Cleveland had the #1 pick and the rights to Wiggins. There was literally no other team out there that could check all these boxes for Love:
1) had the young assets to make the deal while still having enough left over to be a good team
2) were willing to part with those assets
3) was facing pressure to make the win now move
There weren’t many other viable options for Love. Both teams were highly incentivized to make this trade work, and Love wanted to out. He wanted to be just about anywhere but Minnesota.
Knew about Malone but figured needed something a bit more current.
I thought if Lebron cared about winning as #1 priority last offseason he'd either stay or go to Philly.
No chance they get Love if they pick 2? Or 3? No way at that time Minny would have taken Parker or Embiid?
You can LOL all you want but in Minnesota he was as good there as Butler is now.That was my point....LOL.
Holy shit...can't believe I forgot Horford.Philly FAs: best ones have probably been Moses Malone, Elton Brand, and just this summer Al Horford
ClearlyI think LeBron cared about winning but only in LA, and was clearly willing to punt a year if they missed out on FAs year one.
Only a big hairy snatch would put a poster on ignore.
Right.....And what was the reason for losing Games 3, 6 and 7 without Green.Can't really buy that, they were playing at home to close it out, that's motivation by itself.
Still mentioning me while ignoring me.Thank you for your insight. You can go suck dtgold's dick now.
If we are talking about both teams from 1988-89 to present (to compare apples/apples) how does one team have 17 more chances?What's hard to understand (actually not by reading many of your posts) is that you somehow think the same number equates to the same success, when one team had 17 more chances to succeed, but didn't.
Thank you for your insight. You can go suck dtgold's dick now.
OK...so maybe the Cavs had a 3 year head start whoop-de-hell. Neither has had much success without its star.But let's not consider, IN THAT SAME TIME FRAME, the Heat started as expansion franchise where it is standard to struggle for awhile so what you are trying to convince yourself of, is pretty fucking stupid.
If we are talking about both teams from 1988-89 to present (to compare apples/apples) how does one team have 17 more chances?
FIFYNo.
More like I usually don't always feel the need to go back and read pages I missed.
I only usually go back and look and alerts and base comments on poster and not post.
OK, but pretty clear I was not talking about seasons where there was no Heat as I did not include series wins from those times.I never was only focusing on that specific time frame.
I was comparing franchise history.
Do you really NEED to do this shit every fucking day?
Thank you for your insight. You can go suck dtgold's dick now.
They didn't trade anyone wor Westbrook. Guess they value entire roster as much?Did Miami trade him for Westbrook? No, so OKC went a different direction. They valued Herro. No denying it now.
OK, but pretty clear I was not talking about seasons where there was no Heat as I did not include series wins from those times.
If you mean correct your mistakes and explain when you are off base, yeah, it's tiring for me. Agreed.