No I just corrected his 5 years datum.
I think he would since he would not have seen them.
Misunderstood where you were going.
So getting to a Finals and losing is not as successful as bowing out to the team who lost in the Finals?
Actually, no, it's not like that at all. Never mind the Cavs won a title and Buffalo did not.
OK. And Cleveland/NE Ohio is a large footnote in NFL history, but cannot say I care much about it.
You aren't too sharp, are ya sweetie? I might mention it, but assuming, say, it was the 1976 season (when they came close) that would be because I'd have remembered it. Wiggy would not have a memory of it.
You gave a rats ass as you offered an opinion earlier with your foolish comparison to the Bills. Try again, my friend, and if it helps you not deflect, think of it as a generic question and not relating to any specific teams.....
Moving the goal posts is talking about titles in the 80s or earlier in a recent NBA discussion.
I see....so if I am talking football with someone and they try to rip Cleveland I should just remind him of all our titles in the 40s, 50s and 60s?
Foolish because I never said bow down. And, yes, one title is a little better than none. And if Buffalo won one of the titles and you asked me if they had a better run than an NFL team who won 1 title and played for no others I would say the Bills run was better....as would any rational fan.
