dtgold88
Well-Known Member
not here they didn't, but nice try.Wrong again.
I was the only one who called you on it, while SEVERAL others took the approach of trying to help you clean it up.
stay focused.
not here they didn't, but nice try.Wrong again.
I was the only one who called you on it, while SEVERAL others took the approach of trying to help you clean it up.
I agree that is EXACTLY what she needs to do. It seems maybe they thought they could strong arm taking over the team based on an assumption she might be soft?From what was said out here by a local Lakers "insider", she never seriously considered it and no calls were made.
She was pissed that the AD trade request was made public and knew it came from Rich Paul and Lebron. Jeanie is trying to run the Lakers like her Dad did.
Dr. Buss never wanted any moves, whether they be trades, contract negotiations, etc. made public until it was already done. That's part of why Shaq was moved quickly. Once he went public with his "You gonna pay me now", his days as a Laker were numbered.
So, when the AD thing went public, that made her mad and she briefly considered trading Lebron because of it. But nothing was ever actually explored.
I am hoping that after the season, she gets everyone together, lays down the law, puts a stop to the bullshit and gets everyone back on the same page. Pretty sure that's what Dr. Buss would have done.
Again, I already told you. Cleared cap room and accrued assets in hopes to be a contender again. It worked.Denver hasn't had to rely on a generational player to make the playoffs. Again I ask, what has Cleveland done without Lebron?
You think someone else here thinks a team or player allowing a rebound, which means they allowed a shot, must mean poor D was played?Why would I admit to something that is clearly YOUR OPINION and not factual? Not sure why you think anyone else agrees with you there.
Yea there are tons of other players that have done exactly the same thing. But how many of them will be remembered for doing something significant? Just blending in IMO doesn't cut it at the professional level.12 years in the league for 7 different teams, sure sounds like they had some use for him in order to make the roster, mostly for depth in the latter years.
those were newer so wanted to give you the chance to add them.That's why I said "etc"!
OKI'm STILL dying from the bolded 72 size font though.
Again, I already told you. Cleared cap room and accrued assets in hopes to be a contender again. It worked.
lol you can't be this stupid. Do you understand what it means when someone bolds text? hahahaha I can't with you. hahahahahahahahaYou think someone else here thinks a team or player allowing a rebound, which means they allowed a shot, must mean poor D was played?
Please never change
Imagine analyzing player ability beyond point totals. What was the opinion of Russell after 2 seasons?
Yea there are tons of other players that have done exactly the same thing. But how many of them will be remembered for doing something significant? Just blending in IMO doesn't cut it at the professional level.
You, too, can ask if you aren't able to read and comprehend my friend. Yes, they contended for a top pick during their tank that worked and helped them win....say it with me.....A TITLE.It worked? I think most mean contending FOR A TITLE, not contending for the top draft pick lol.
oh yah of course LeBron in 2004....i thought we were talking about the rebuilding years sicne lebron left--- not well over a decade agoCOUGHlebronCOUGH
Yes, I do.lol you can't be this stupid. Do you understand what it means when someone bolds text? hahahaha I can't with you. hahahahahahahaha
I think this is a fair point, but not sure how much extra credit I want to give for staying in the league and stealing money longer.He was obviously a bad draft pick anywhere in the first round in hindsight. I was comparing him to the others in that original post. Bennett is already out of the league, and Fultz can't get on the court due to broken confidence apparently.
Future HOF
The Cavs fans here are extremely chatty LOLIt is incredible how much talk there is about a team whose only relevance will be on lottery day.
The Cavs are going to stink for the foreseeable future. Maybe they once again get ANOTHER No. 1 pick and get Zion and that can begin a turnaround but it will still take years for that to happen.
Well not really. IF it happens it should only be 2-3 years (guess technically that is yearS, but thinking not what you meant). Will only happen if they can get the right guy in THIS draft. If not I agree it will be a long time if ever.It is incredible how much talk there is about a team whose only relevance will be on lottery day.
The Cavs are going to stink for the foreseeable future. Maybe they once again get ANOTHER No. 1 pick and get Zion and that can begin a turnaround but it will still take years for that to happen.