dtgold88
Well-Known Member
To your first comment I agree. Pretty much everyone has pluses and minuses.honestly, out of the people they're currently kicking around, it'd be a VERY tough choice...
but gun to my head, I think i'd go Jackson...
To your first comment I agree. Pretty much everyone has pluses and minuses.honestly, out of the people they're currently kicking around, it'd be a VERY tough choice...
but gun to my head, I think i'd go Jackson...
I guess I could prepare some sort of flow chart.C'mon man, get with the program. Do you even message board?
honestly, out of the people they're currently kicking around, it'd be a VERY tough choice...
but gun to my head, I think i'd go Jackson...
Kobe.
well you just gotta hit-----The premise was, don't blow your load on loading up on draft picks and your grand scheme thinking history repeats itself in this case. From all of those number 1 picks that Cleveland was lucky to land, it still took Lebron returning to make it actually work. Salary cap space and draft picks doesn't always work. Hell, you guys gave the Lakers shit for years while having Lebron return and they're still not close to a title. So maybe consider yourself in that same scenario.
lol
From a "knowing the game" standpoint...Kobe would be great.
From a patience standpoint...he'd be a disaster. It would take about 3 games (if that) before he started subbing himself in.
Yep...the reason, I think, superstars don't usually make good coaches.lol
From a "knowing the game" standpoint...Kobe would be great.
From a patience standpoint...he'd be a disaster. It would take about 3 games (if that) before he started subbing himself in.
if its the right max player- like Dwade- why not?No. Can you read and comprehend?
I said teams with 1 overpriced 'max' player can't compete.
In other words, the Heat doing what they did vs not signing Hayward made no difference.
lol
From a "knowing the game" standpoint...Kobe would be great.
From a patience standpoint...he'd be a disaster. It would take about 3 games (if that) before he started subbing himself in.
Yep...the reason, I think, superstars don't usually make good coaches.
and no, not a fan of Ty coaching the Lakers. nothing I see tells me he'd be a successful coach here...
I would love to see the look on LeBron's face while Kobe's drawing up a play in the huddle that he disagrees with.
Yep...the reason, I think, superstars don't usually make good coaches.
In order of preference for me it's...
Keep Luke: None of this is his fault and he's the only one who hasn't been pointing any fingers. He's a good coach with the potential to be very good, but has been put in an untenable situation.
Doc: If this is a real thing (apparently he's always wanted to coach the Lakers), I think he would be the most attractive to potential FA's.
Lue: He knows how to deal with Lebron and Lebron seems to like and listen to him. That's 75% of the battle right there.
Jackson: He did a good job developing the Warriors when they were a bunch of kids learning how to play. Don't know if he could have done with the Warriors what Kerr has because he was apparently such an asshole, they got rid of him. If he learned his lesson from that, he could be good for the Lakers kids.
Kidd: No thank you. About the only positive I can see is that he might be able to help develop Lonzo.
Kobe would probably punch him. lol
Do you miss Papa Ball as much as I do? I think he could be an assest for the Lakers.
So if the Sixers can win tonight and tomorrow night, they will be 2 full games up on the Pacers with their remaining 10 games being against the Bucks, the Nets, the Heat, and 7 teams in tank mode.
I have to say I embrace a Sixers-Pistons 1st round matchup.