- 172,128
- 53,307
- 1,033
- Joined
- Jun 26, 2014
- Location
- Still stuck here in Nashville
- Hoopla Cash
- $ 422,954.23
That fucking sucks
It does.
That fucking sucks
The Dodgers should have offered more annually for a shorter period of time, say 5 or 6 years.
Wade is a cheater, not a rapeist.
Keep bringing that goofy 42% fg pct bitch up, make me laugh.
Dudes barely top 15 All time and you are top 0 worth my time, sit the fuck down.
Kings aren't making the playoffs
Very true. And Kyrie's never won a playoff series w/o LeBron as a teammate. If the Celtics get bounced in the 1st round I know who I'm blaming.
I said Kyrie would "have a far greater impact" even though I would choose Curry over him? did I give a situation where I said I'd take Kyrie over Curry?My post was in response to you saying Kyrie would have a far greater impact than Curry. You are clearly wrong otherwise he would be taken BEFORE Curry in any situation when picking to build a team.
Has it really come to just making things up for you? so sad.No way he thinks Hou loses if Iggy isn't hurt if he can't concede that Dray & Bogut being out in 2016 didn't make a difference in that series outcome.
A game against Olynyk would still be nice....no need to take chances.In all fairness, I don't think Love needs much help getting hurt
A poll of fans with preconceived notions who don't understand the game is "proof"?I tell you what.
Why don't you post a poll?
When 90% say they take Klay over Love, will you actually admit you are wrong for once?
Because either you are trolling, a blatant homer, or you don't know basketball at all if you believe Love is the more impactful player in 2019.
was just replying to someone else who made the statement about Durant. Relax.Why even post this?
It wasn't a possibilty because they were over the cap.
Even if it had been, you continually neglect the concept of fit between players. The GS system was a much better fit for KD than Cleveland would have been because of two ball movement.
Not saying Cleveland wouldn't have won, they would have. But you make it seem like it would have been better than current GS, and that is not an assumption I would make.
I wouldn't sweat it too much.
The bottom 3 teams all have a 14% chance of getting the No. 1 pick. Even No. 4, which the Knicks could theoretically climb up to, only drops down to 12.5%. No. 5 is almost certainly out of reach for the Knicks.
Granted there is one notable difference between No.1 and No. 4. The spread of spots you can wind up. The no. 1 team can at worst get the No. 5 spot. The No. 4 team could theoretically wind up with the No. 8 spot although that is very unlikely.
The no. 1 team has a 60% of getting the 4 or 5 spot.
Because a poll among people with preconceived notions who ignore logic and facts proves what, exactly?I already suggested he start a poll......and the sound of crickets was the response.
so I guess you'll tell those who are sure Klay is better they couldn't know because they don't guard each other.Nice job using a mediocre stat from 1 game to compare 2 players who don't guard each other.
Brilliant!
"definitely"?GS definitely would not have beaten Houston last year with Kyrie instead of Curry.
The problem is, a couple more wins and they could end up dropping to 6th. Hopefully they stay in the top 3
Nope.....LA thought they'd add a 2nd star with Lebron so instead of the sure thing at a below market price they let him walk......then failed to sign the 2nd star. I'm caught up.Difficult to process.....????
I'd say 6th is safely out of reach. The Knicks would need to double their win total to have even a possibility of 6th. I don't see the Knicks going 13-8 to finish the season.
"definitely"?
But OK, I was wrong. should have said those who understand the game.
I actually did but only heard about it....thanks.For those who missed it....
Only talent I'll take Kyrie, but total package I'd go Dame.Dame Dollar all day everyday