- Thread starter
- #1
stick kick it eh?
I think the idea is that, even without the highly advanced training and changes in the game we've seen, these guys would've still been beasts just as they were.That's a pretty stupid article. It would make more sense to postulate which HOF'ers would not kick butt today.
By definition HOF'ers are those that were unquestionably superior in talent and skill than the majority of their peers.
I would find it hard to believe that any HOF'er of any era when given the training, etc. that players receive today would not be upper echelon players today.
I was kinda surprised at Sharpe being on the list.
Reggie White was a man among boys when he played. I really expected him to be on this list.
If Sharpe didn't have the freak accident, we'd be talking about him among the best WRs in league history. In 7 seasons, he averaged 85 catches, 1162 yards, and 8.5 TD per year. Here's how the all-time greats stack up:I was kinda surprised at Sharpe being on the list.
Reggie White was a man among boys when he played. I really expected him to be on this list.
Oh. I am not dissing Sharpe. He just wasnt on my radar, when I read this article. I do remember him. Also watched when he got hurt. Which was a freak accident. They also make a good point. imagine rodgers throwing to him. What he would have stacked up in stats!If Sharpe didn't have the freak accident, we'd be talking about him among the best WRs in league history. In 7 seasons, he averaged 85 catches, 1162 yards, and 8.5 TD per year. Here's how the all-time greats stack up:
Rice: 77/1144/9.8
Carter: 69/869/8.1
Owens: 72/1062/10.2
Moss: 70/1092/11.1
Sharpe and White should both be on this list and not John Randle.I was kinda surprised at Sharpe being on the list.
Reggie White was a man among boys when he played. I really expected him to be on this list.
Randle should still be on this list. he was a beast.Sharpe and White should both be on this list and not John Randle.
Isn't the training of today inferior? These guys got the union to invalidate all but a few offseason practices. Preseason is meaningless for nearly every starter and is instead used to assess the viability of 3rd and 4th stringers on the 53+5 man roster. They may as well do some light jogging. Consequently, conditioning is terrible, and the NFL regular season doesn't really get underway until about Week 4.That's a pretty stupid article. It would make more sense to postulate which HOF'ers would not kick butt today.
By definition HOF'ers are those that were unquestionably superior in talent and skill than the majority of their peers.
I would find it hard to believe that any HOF'er of any era when given the training, etc. that players receive today would not be upper echelon players today.
Dan Marino and Michael Irvin and Reggie White didn't have regular jobs. They kept in shape during the Spring.@Mofo you're confusing training with organized team activities (OTA's). Yes there is far less team activities now but back in the early days most of those guys had regular jobs during the offseason so there was no year-round conditioning and training etc.
That's part of it. Both the regimens and the roles are more targeted, but the intensity of training at the highest level was so brutal before. The NFL of yesterday was very much a "survival of the fittest" whereas today it's more, "next man up". Odell Beckham would get the sh*t kicked out of him in a previous NFL era, pushing off and then performing circus catches with his magic glue-gloves. Meanwhile, Darrell Green would be penalized out of today's game for being too strong / fast / aggressive.The stuff that Walter Payton and Jerry Rice did back in their days was considered legendary because no one else was doing it. Today that wouldn't even be considered cross training and the regimens that athletes have is more targeted.
well he is way underrated in my book, but this is about who would be able to play now. He had one of the highest motors ever for a DL. Which would fit perfectly into now.He was good but I wouldn't include him in the top 8.