dkmightyhammer
Livin' la vida loca
Thanks for fixing the link. My computer skills are lacking.
I too can find hundreds of articles that say luck is better, but I'm not interested in convincing naive homers that have nothing better to do but use a 500 post thread proving their massive inferiority complex. ..
You seem more interested in just cheerleading your man.
Part of this debate is that it falls into so many areas,for one every analyst predicted Luck to be once in a generation QB and sang praise of him before he even threw a pass even so far as stating he will bring you a SB!.
Now Wilson,he was too short etc etc and people even here i bet laughed when Seattle picked him and the analysts even laughed when PC said he was going to start him,fact is is that the analysts all have egg on their faces and it is in black and white and video of what they said so they will pump up Luck no matter what.
Me? Cheerleading? Oh boy.....how ironic! It doesn't take much to rile up you fanboys....enjoy your Lombardi and we'll enjoy the better QB...k?
Watching the GOAT for nearly two decades, I am convinced will go down as one, if not the, all time greats. While Wilson may be a good QB, I think he's just another Warren Moon
Me? Cheerleading? Oh boy.....how ironic! It doesn't take much to rile up you fanboys....enjoy your Lombardi and we'll enjoy the better QB...k?
Not only is Luck superior to Wilson, he's superior to every QB in the league. ....go cry....
Wilson has more touchdown passes despite having nearly 450 fewer pass attempts than Luck. And he also has a Y/A a full yard higher.
Well, if you hadn't proven your objectivity in the last 20 pages, this certainly does itNot only is Luck superior to Wilson, he's superior to every QB in the league. ....go cry....
To this point, all of the chest thumping and nut licking about Luck has largely been based on his potential and not his actual output, which at times has been impressive and at other times not so much.