You missed my point completely. The "we" you continually refer to is a misnomer. Everyone evaluates and places value differently. It doesn't make them right and you wrong nor vice versa. You have chosen to use one set of stats to support your position, that's fine. It doesn't mean the other person is wrong if they don't accept those stats as irrefutable facts.
As far as backing up my venting.....just because someone disagrees with you doesn't mean they are venting. It means they have a different opinion. After all, that's what we all do here, including you, express opinions. This is what folks are tying to politely say.
boy that "joy you and others can vent and at least back it up" wasnt finished i should have added still others dont
they are who i am directing my comments to
your o/line disagreement , to me isnt venting , its looking at a situation differently and the both of us not agreeing
venting is " we need to fire the whole o/line , they are the worst ever " that is what i am talking about, then you come back days later and say 'i didnt mean that i was just angry
as for facts , my facts that i accept , then throw out some tangible facts that contradict what is on cold hard paper or type ? the fact or stat is we are 3-7 . it means we are losing more then we are winning i dont see any other way you can take that
now our o/line is weak at anchoring in the middle the stats on chester ,monty and stiger show that
i am not using the force , or the eyeball test or a theory on that statement . its there in black and white
what else do you use ? in your mind our pass protection is bottom tier and i take it you get that by watching it . i dont see that . i see it as middle of the road by watching it and i bring stats to enforce it
do you have anything else that is tangible ?
qbs get hit , they have to move , teams pressure the middle . does that mean we arent avg there ?