- Thread starter
- #121
complete BS we most certainly we did backed up by snap counts posted
So records aren’t on the qb anymore like they were with KC ? No values at all
yes absolutely and the clearly show they ran 2 and 3 te setssnap counts for TE's?
falco's o/line isnt doing that well either as my stats and film clearly showno. Im not saying CW was great. He got destroyed behind that line and you know it.
actually we were down 7-o for the eagles game. Drafting Dotson 1st round, paying CW contract, and giving up draft picks. The plan was to throw the ball around. Not ground and pound
falco's o/line isnt doing that well either as my stats and film clearly show
again the stats and film clearly show you are wrong , look at the stats and tapethey are playing better since Larsen entered the lineup. Martin the center was a shit show. Plus, Turner and Norwell are improving. You say it's the same guys, but the same guys are improving their play as the year goes on. you add the defense getting turnovers now, its a big difference than earlier this year. Now with Chace back it should be even better.
I didn’t mean we never trailed the Eagles. We were never really In a position to have to throw the ball in that game is what I was saying.
You do not know Ron Rivera.
i understand the pocket awareness factor. no arguments but he wasnt getting benched after the bears game. He lost his job b/c of injury.
again the stats and film clearly show you are wrong , look at the stats and tape
Had CW played well, he would not have lost the job, even with TH having the record he has. The injury opened the door but his play cost him the job.
the 2-4 record was not all on CW.
the fact was the plays werent made , end of storyactually, we were and guess what TH got picked. We got lucky the defense recovered the fumble from Goddart on the non-call face mask. That drive turned into a FG b/c the offense could move the ball. One offensive TD against the worst team in the league in Houston. cmon now
I never said it was all on CW. Most of it was.
CW was a big part of the victory against Jax.
CW was one of many reasons we lost to Detroit.
CW was a huge reason we lost to Dallas, and Philly.
CW was part of an offense that could not score against TEN.
We beat Chicago in spite of CW. You claim he can hand the ball off too, but when they use the game plan that has been so successful for TH, CW scores 12 points and throws for 99 yards, and the Chicago defense isn’t exactly great.
actually, we were and guess what TH got picked. We got lucky the defense recovered the fumble from Goddart on the non-call face mask. That drive turned into a FG b/c the offense could move the ball. One offensive TD against the worst team in the league in Houston. cmon now
RR stayed with TH b/c of the locker room and team rallied with him. He wasn't going to change it. CW wasnt getting benched b/c of his play.
So, the players believe TH is better and the players play better with TH.
The coaches believe TH is better and coach better with TH.
So according to your logic, CW is better and should start. Think about that for a moment.
You don’t think CW was playing his way to the bench after scoring 8, 10, 17, and 12 points in consecutive games while having the 27th worst QBR in football?
I agree with 1 and 3 not 2 and 4. In spite of CW for the Bears game? lol Samuel dropped a td pass and Slye missed an easy kick,. Thats is 10 points for CW right there and the game would have been over alot sooner. The offense moved the ball against a good defense in TEN. CW didn't make the play at the end. no arguments. He has to make that read. But we took a very good Tenn team down to the last play of the game. What is wrong with that?