I agree, unless she is asking to file her case separately for a defense trial or asking to remove the non-disclosure clause. More likely the latter with what others suggested.
Yeah he has.
OK, say ""Deshaun Watson probably committed sexual assault and sexual misconduct" We'll take baby steps at this point
But this was what I said for which you claimed I was his PR director..."I would think they (the NFL) would care more about what his actual indiscretions are never mind all you are doing is guessing he lied."
Sorry were you actually expecting it to be the NFL answering you???
Here's the deal. There will always be teams that are singled out here each year because of their own doing (it has been New England, Seattle, Philly and Dallas is always in the mix). No one gives a shit about the Browns per se'. They are probably one of the teams people have the least amount of an opinion about in the league. But when you go on and on (not all Browns fans of course, just a couple) arguing with everyone for 100 pages on multiple threads about crap that is obviously wrong don't expect silence. That's just how the internet works. The dumb comments get responses from the masses
I just did say that. ....I only said I'm not certain what makes something rise to a level of assault or misconduct.
No one cares about the Browns. We are answering and contesting stupid opinions by a couple of Browns fans
You didn't get a crystal clear answer to that from what I wrote? I thought maybe the word absolutely would give it away, but I was pretty sure the next two sentences drove home the point if it didn't
I mean, most of those opinions are supported by logic, facts and/or reason with no agenda.
On some level?
You literally take what is said to you by others and say it back to other people. It's kind of bizarre at this point. I don't want to call it psychotic, but...?
I forgot I sometimes have to explain things to you like you are a 4-year-old. Your answer didn't really have to do with whether you are able to question the actual accusations by the women. Please feel free to tell me what among this blather says whether there is an accusation you might question......."I'm interested to see of the 4 that didn't settle who the other 3 are - we know who one is. I wonder if he thinks those 3 (or one or tow of them) are cases he can win because he did no wrong in them. I'm focusing on the big picture and that tells me he is guilty and you don't need anything more than what has already been stated in this thread to know that. I don't let one possibly questionable accusation cloud my thoughts on him being a criminal or not."You didn't get a crystal clear answer to that from what I wrote? I thought maybe the word absolutely would give it away, but I was pretty sure the next two sentences drove home the point if it didn't
Wrong. Those types of threads exist with all fan bases. The Browns just happen to have a couple of fans who are arguing against what everyone else thinks in those threads and thus the 100 pages. See Wentz and Brady threads...
No levels? r*pe is the same as masturbating in front of someone (if he did that)?
what I literally do if I disagree with someone is explain why using logic, facts or reason with no agenda.
My problem with this line of thinking is that the NFL may not be fully aware of all his indiscretions either. Should he be punished for shit he didn't do? Absolutely not, and you don't know that all these women are telling the truth.
Gee, I don't know, perhaps the very first sentence that you purposely left out that literally said and I quote "absolutely there are some things I question."
But, both are crimes so either way he's a criminal and sexual predator. But of course you need to add "if he did that"
. That right there is why you literally have zero credibility on anything
