No problem with it, but her day in court is about money. Idea she needs to be in court to talk about what happened is what I don't agree with.
This is your unbiased view point? What evidence do you base that on?
Even the ones who filed after the trade?
I'd say not enough, as dt has made this a full time job.
Yes.
She can tell her story for the rest of both of their lives. Perhaps that's what she prefers? She could write a book, go on 60 minutes, be a vocal anti-sexual harassment/#metoo voice, whatever she wants.
I mean, I never said I would dismiss it out of hand, I just don't take everything that supports an agenda as fact. You do and that's cool.
I do often have too much time on my hands....no disagreement there. But unfortunately, my objective work is being done for free.
I agree she will settle, too....meaning all she wanted was more money.
Or, the first half of what I wrote...
If she gets more money and no NDA.
Pretty funny, you accusing others of having a agenda. Something you fall back on a lot. How many different posters have you accused of having a agenda? Next time you want to accuse someone of having an agenda do it while looking in the mirror.
Sue Watson for unpaid services, I'll testify in your behalf.
She may feel she has already accomplished her goal of exposing him as a sexual predator for the whole world to know. At this point anyone with even the slightest hint of objectivity can see what he is and that he is obviously guilty. She may request as part of her settlement/award (if she goes to a hearing) his going to counseling or use part of the settlement for a victim's fund or simply for him to give a public apology. Who knows what her goal is, but that sure isn't for a Watson apologist to judge.
To answer your question, I'd say maybe a half dozen in this thread? whoever seems to be 1005 on one side of the discussion. No mirror in this room, but me willing to see both sides is not exactly me having an agenda. Just because I do not believe everything I hear against Watson does not mean I have an agenda....though when you do believe it all you do have an agenda, Mr. Pot.
Not much of a guess - his contract with the Browns only exempts the cases he disclosed.
Is it only for you to judge with your anti watson agenda? was there any story you could have heard where you'd have thought, "now wait a minute"?
Not sure how fast they are, but it's been an ongoing investigation. Doing due diligence before the trade is the Browns problem, really. The league's job is to decide about player discipline and investigate for that purpose, not according the Browns' calendar.
OK.....it's only a lie if more came forward who told the truth and some of those additional victims stories are suspect. I mean, he cannot stop others from still coming forward and, sure, they could be telling the truth. But maybe they aren't?
