Sparhawk
SportsHoopla Ombudsman
Did you ask Lebron and he replied to you that he doesn't want Bledsoe to start behind him anymore?
You start with "correction"... you correct me (LOL) on what?
Then:
"the Lakers would love to add a PG who can take some of the playmaking burden off of LeBron",
but:
"they will only make a move like that at a reasonable cost" and also:
"subtracting 2 key rotation players is not the type of move they would seek out unless they player they return is significantly better than what they give".
I guess you don't "correct me" but instead "confirm me"!!!
1. There is no PG around at more reasonable cost than Bledsoe given his abilities and what he would add to the Lakers given he is the fastest PG in the league (exactly the reason why he is Bron's favorite PG).
2. Bledsoe's minutes alone, would exceed what would Green and Kuzma play given that the starting line up would be Bledsoe, KCP, Bron, AD, McGee and Bledsoe is capable (as he has many times proved) to even play all 48mins (if needed).
3. The salary cost of Green and Kuzma for the Lakers is about the same as Bledsoe's salary, but given that Kuzma is still on the salary of his rookie contract, the cost is projected to be about double of what it is today a couple of season's later (while Bledsoe's salary is "locked" to rise at an equivalent percentage or less as the threshold rises for each of the next three seasons).
4. The Lakers open a roster spot up to add another wing or combo guard next to Bron.
5. The Lakers can get Green back (like Bledsoe he is "Klutch"... remember?) If he refuses his P.O. (I doubt the Kings would have any objection - probably it would make them very happy too if they can avoid his salary and empty another roster spot up - they bought J. Parker already to rotate on Bjelica's place) or a season later if he doesn't. (surely the Kings wouldn't resign him given his age, or include him on their future plans for that matter).
Obviously, you are known to be "the smart ass" in here who argues only for arguing purposes, and nothing more or for "prestige among stupid purposes", but it only proves you stupid to do so... You know less than elementary on the game with respect to me and it shows.
I hope you bother to read, because you never do and you keep quoting on other all the time... it will help you learn some...
OK... now his contract is "fair"! No it's not "fair", it's a steal!
"If Bledsoe was truly as valuable as you claim, you would not be throwing him in every possible trade idea you have."
Now that's truly laughable! You know how many clutch combo guards the Bucks have?
We bring Hill (the best 3pt shooter in the entire league this season) and Donte from bench!
Now, obviously we will be starting Donte at 2 for the postseason, but the kid hasn't had even 90 games yet! On him the Bucks have their 3rd All Star next to Giannis and Middleton for both their present and future success and the Bucks additionally have two clutch ballhandlers/playmakers on Giannis and Middleton in their starting roster...
What would the Bucks look for next, is to add the 4th clutch piece in their roster and BB "fulfills the bill" perfect being at the correct age which fits our time table in order to keep contending for as long as Giannis career lasts... We won't have to look for a replacement for at least another six seasons...
Then it's the salary of Bledsoe... he has the 3rd largest contract in the Bucks roster after accepting a long term "team friendly" in order to stay with the Bucks (he said: "Those past two seasons were the most fun in my career and I want to stay here" in the interview after he signed the extension mid-season last year) and therefore can bring buck valuable return, while the Bucks already have enough depth so that they won't miss anything if they replace him...
Bledsoe and Ilyasova add up to nearly 24M for the Bucks next season and if we add the MLE, the Bucks can add 35M of return which will then turn them to an unbeatable super team!
But as I said before:
"Obviously, you are known to be "the smart ass" in here who argues only for arguing purposes, and nothing more or for "prestige among stupid purposes", but it only proves you stupid to do so... You know less than elementary on the game with respect to me and it shows."
