- Thread starter
- #1
lol“George W. Bush explains why Abraham Lincoln might not be the greatest President of all time”
of course, its why jim plunkett isnt in. he has as many as eli, who some say will be in.Like I used to say in the old endless Brady/Manning debates. Who the fuck really cares other than dickless fanboys.Great players all. HOFers, all time greats. Should be enough just to have watched some of these guys play the game at such a high level. And no, SB wins are not the end all, be all.
He’s not the best qb ever, but some how, he is far less gay than Aaron Rodgers.
So based on this misguided post there can be no greatest of all time at any position. And let's forget all the plays in a season that lead a team to a SB let's focus on the one great defensive play to attempt to undermine all the other successes. Great logic.Rivers' stance is precisely the stance I've always held. Wins are a TEAM stat, not a player stat - particularly in a sport where one player is 1/53 of the equation (not counting coaches & management). It's asinine to crown a player the "Greatest" because of team accomplishments. And his citation of the SEA-NE Super Bowl is spot-on too.
Brady is one of the best; not necessarily the best.
So based on this misguided post there can be no greatest of all time at any position. And let's forget all the plays in a season that lead a team to a SB let's focus on the one great defensive play to attempt to undermine all the other successes. Great logic.