Sportster 72
Well-Known Member
I will disagree for one reason and one reason only.
Had they gone with Tannehill, thats three other prime talents they would have had the ability to add. Granted there are no guarantees. But the decision was made that they guy they did take was worth 4 players ultimately. So even if they whiffed on the #6 pick with Tannehill that would have still left three players in the top 100 over the three drafts..... as clueless as Bruce is... even a blind monkey can hit a wall if he throws enough shit in the general direction.
I agree, I wasn't sure about Tannehill but I was never for giving up half a team (yes there is yeast in that comment) for a guy who ended up not being as good as Tannehill. As you said who knows who they would have drafted and how it would have turned out but what we know is we got a one year 8-8 QB for three potential players.
All that said we did draft a capable QB that year several rounds later and our owner and FO couldn't figure out if he was worth it or not.
