NWPATSFAN
Well-Known Member
TE="SonnyCID, post: 6486349, member: 4328"]
To find "true value" of a playert you take them out of their system and see how they do in other systems?
Brady has a ton of success in an offense of short passes, should we assume that if he went to Seattle or GB and was in an offense where he rolls out often and and use the ball deep more, that his value would be adversely affected? Probably not.
And it's funny... In 2013, Brady's relatively down passing year was blamed on his poor receivers. In 2014, he gets Gronk back, puts up better numbers, and the "he can make any receiver great" argument comes flying back.[/QUOTE]
That's my point. Brady is a system QB. No i personally don't think he would do well rolling out. Have you seen him run? TB has done pretty good with the lack luster of talented receivers he's been dealt. I wasn't the one who started the debate tha RW would be better with better RWs. That's almost a given. I'm sick of many Seattle fans using it as an excuse. Do you need more examples of what TB has been able to do? How about Welker a cast off let go by Miami and he became a stud no one heard of. Eddleman a 7th round QB out of Kent State has done pretty well in that system.
it's really amazing how many Hawk fans get their collective panties in an uproar when someone doesn't praise everyone on that team.
I'll say it again. I like RW he is currently in a system that works for him. I would like to see what he coukd do in a different system is all? I don't really care if he stays or goes. Just think he more so than a lot of other QBs I'd like to see what he could do elsewhere? Maybe we find out in Seattle once ML leaves. If Seattle can't find that dominant back the system may have to change to keep on winning.
To find "true value" of a playert you take them out of their system and see how they do in other systems?
Brady has a ton of success in an offense of short passes, should we assume that if he went to Seattle or GB and was in an offense where he rolls out often and and use the ball deep more, that his value would be adversely affected? Probably not.
And it's funny... In 2013, Brady's relatively down passing year was blamed on his poor receivers. In 2014, he gets Gronk back, puts up better numbers, and the "he can make any receiver great" argument comes flying back.[/QUOTE]
That's my point. Brady is a system QB. No i personally don't think he would do well rolling out. Have you seen him run? TB has done pretty good with the lack luster of talented receivers he's been dealt. I wasn't the one who started the debate tha RW would be better with better RWs. That's almost a given. I'm sick of many Seattle fans using it as an excuse. Do you need more examples of what TB has been able to do? How about Welker a cast off let go by Miami and he became a stud no one heard of. Eddleman a 7th round QB out of Kent State has done pretty well in that system.
it's really amazing how many Hawk fans get their collective panties in an uproar when someone doesn't praise everyone on that team.
I'll say it again. I like RW he is currently in a system that works for him. I would like to see what he coukd do in a different system is all? I don't really care if he stays or goes. Just think he more so than a lot of other QBs I'd like to see what he could do elsewhere? Maybe we find out in Seattle once ML leaves. If Seattle can't find that dominant back the system may have to change to keep on winning.