- Thread starter
- #141
hunzworth
Active Member
I agree that Stinesping (or any OC) should have full control of the offense, but imo thats prob not how it works with Beamer. I look at it like stinespring had good offensive lines when he was the OL coach, the larger road grader type o linemen are obviously what he prefers because when he was in the position that was his type of system. So why if he had any say so at all would he look to hire an Oline coach with a completely different type of system. Also being that stiney has coached some good O lines he has to realize that these arent that great so if he had the authority he'd make a change.
FWIW: my biggest problem is that we basically have no philosophy. Maybe im wrong but imo if Beamer had his way we'd be more of a pro-style run between the tackles p/a pass type of team, is stiney had his way we'd be mostly shotgun (spread) type offense, and newsomes OL seem to fit more with a wishbone or option type O. Just seems that we have no identity.
FWIW: my biggest problem is that we basically have no philosophy. Maybe im wrong but imo if Beamer had his way we'd be more of a pro-style run between the tackles p/a pass type of team, is stiney had his way we'd be mostly shotgun (spread) type offense, and newsomes OL seem to fit more with a wishbone or option type O. Just seems that we have no identity.