SonnyCID
Conocido Miembro
I was just wondering what Chris Canty's ruling on this would be.
I agree with you, it had no impact on the game.
no one cares about the game before ..
Okay...how about the game before that...or before that???
i dont think that anyone could prove it from the games before this came out ..
Yeah....at this point, the Patsies don't get off that easily. They don't deserve the benefit of the doubt. Maybe that's unfair, but they are the ones that put themselves in this position. Quite simply...only a moron would believe this is the first time they have ever done this.
yup they have been doing it all along but this time its provable ...but then again just like on the field it only becomes a penalty when you get caught
But i'm getting sick and tired about everywhere i look the Fucking Mass Media only wants to talk about:
"deflate gate"
"patriots defleated some balls"
"pariots Cheated"
THE PATRIOTS ARE A BETTER TEAM
It shows by 43-7. I'm sure deflated balls had nothing to do with that score
I agree they're better than the Colts. But why couldn't they prove it without breaking the rules?
There are people saying that the Packers are better than the Seahawks but the Hawks still won. Who knows, perhaps if Luck was using a ball that he could grip better in the cold, like what Brady had, he would have been more accurate and not thrown picks. Maybe that would have kept the Pats points to a reasonable amount and set the stage for a miracle Indy comeback.
Success breeds contempt, hatred and envy. Your fan base is getting your fair share now after hoisting the Lombardi. Dont get me wrong, a lot of times bandwagon fans, or the ones that come out of woodwork can be unbearable and pompous and ruin it for the longstanding real fans.
Success breeds contempt, hatred and envy. Your fan base is getting your fair share now after hoisting the Lombardi. Dont get me wrong, a lot of times bandwagon fans, or the ones that come out of woodwork can be unbearable and pompous and ruin it for the longstanding real fans.
I agree they're better than the Colts. But why couldn't they prove it without breaking the rules?
There are people saying that the Packers are better than the Seahawks but the Hawks still won. Who knows, perhaps if Luck was using a ball that he could grip better in the cold, like what Brady had, he would have been more accurate and not thrown picks. Maybe that would have kept the Pats points to a reasonable amount and set the stage for a miracle Indy comeback.