Meh, I don't see it but the Patriots are the Patriots, whatever they do usually clicks.
Yes, but are the Patrots the Patrots?
Meh, I don't see it but the Patriots are the Patriots, whatever they do usually clicks.
Well they are not the Phins?Yes, but are the Patrots the Patrots?
Pats offensive line is weak and they lost a big piece of it. Also, while they have good RBs and drafted one in the first round the loss of dion Lewis is gonna be felt.
IMO, the Rams had the best off season and if Goff can avoid regressing they are gonna be the team to beat. Nobody will be able to get after the QB like them.
Look the Pats were not going to pay Solder what they NYG did, and they paid way to much but good luck to Nate.
They acquired Trent Brown, Drafted Wynn so they made efforts to secure LT which I feel under Scar they have done. Other than Solder being gone which I feel the covered they won't be any worse than last year which got them to the SB. And we all know we lost because of shitty D play. And I have read you can expect a lot of changes under Flores.
They also lost Cameron Fleming. They lost a corner who played 97% of the snaps. They still can’t rush the passer.
Rams had a better offseason[/QUOTE/
Fleming sucked and when they brought in Gilmore they already had Butlers replacement. Wise is coming off inury, they signed Adrian Clayborn, Hightower is back, Rivers has come on big time I don't agree they can't rush. Matty P always played the bend don't break D, Flores has promised a more aggressive style of play
Exactly. Good moves and losing net talent can sometimes go hand in hand. Some oversensitive ones got a little rustled at that thought, but the writer never really even stated they felt the Pats didn't get worse talent wise. Just that they made smart moves and had a good offseason. IMO you need to get very lucky to not lose talent at LT by letting Solder go, but you made a smart move to let him go at that price. Same with Dallas at LB. We all hope Vander Esch will be better than Hitchens, but as we sit here today you would have to be a complete homer to assume it's definitely true year one. BUT, letting Hitchens go was still the smart move. He just got way too much money from a team that was for some reason desperate to sign him and overpaid for him IMO. So I'll say the same about Dallas as I did NE. They made some really smart money moves and long term moves this offseason that should benefit them for years to come. But it remains to be seen if they upgraded or lost talent when looking at players gained and players lost (ignoring guys back from injury or suspension)Look the Pats were not going to pay Solder what they NYG did, and they paid way to much but good luck to Nate.
They acquired Trent Brown, Drafted Wynn so they made efforts to secure LT which I feel under Scar they have done. Other than Solder being gone which I feel the covered they won't be any worse than last year which got them to the SB. And we all know we lost because of shitty D play. And I have read you can expect a lot of changes under Flores.
Pats offensive line is weak and they lost a big piece of it. Also, while they have good RBs and drafted one in the first round the loss of dion Lewis is gonna be felt.
IMO, the Rams had the best off season and if Goff can avoid regressing they are gonna be the team to beat. Nobody will be able to get after the QB like them.
Was Lewis going to cost the Patriots that much money? I think his absence clearly will be felt... THE OL will start off struggling I am sure but should make it right
Just wondering how much they are now relying on Gronk to be the offense... Considering Edelman might be out 4 games
Still have White. And the new guy Michel. RB is not going to be the issue.
As always it will be the D.
Didn't you lose your best receiver to a suspension for 4 games?
Cheap high upside talent is code for unproven.
It might not have a huge impact in the long run but it still doesn't scream great offseason.we shall see... appealing..... Doubt it gets reduced
It might not have a huge impact in the long run but it still doesn't scream great offseason.
Didn't you lose your best receiver to a suspension for 4 games?
Good point. Personally I really like Michel and think he ends up a better player than Lewis but you never know until you see them on an NFL field. I just worry about a team that has lost OL in the last few years losing their LT and expecting young kids to step up when your key player is a 40 yo QB. Plus they let Fleming go too, but likely they only saw him as depth I guess. I forget did the article even mention losing Cooks?It might not have a huge impact in the long run but it still doesn't scream great offseason.