Caliskinsfan
Burgundy & Gold Forevah
Id give up assets for Carr. just don't know what would be fair or we could reasonably give without too much damage.
this is a fair commentI've never pointed to wins. Honestly skinsdad you are the main one that brings that up when it comes to Watson and Stafford yet make every excuse in the book when someone applies that metric to Kirk.
Yeah, I'm not advocating trading everything just to get a QB. I do hope they are aggressive, as long as it makes sense.Id give up assets for Carr. just don't know what would be fair or we could reasonably give without too much damage.
and that everyone in the FO and RR are on the SAME pageYeah, I'm not advocating trading everything just to get a QB. I do hope they are aggressive, as long as it makes sense.
For once.and that everyone in the FO and RR are on the SAME page
nope i have maintained that wins arent a qb stat but the people who make cases for DW' somehow forget that . stafford is a borderline HOF qb and his wins and losses arent on him . no one says stafford chokes and if you are asking for 3 number ones , some number 2's and some core players then you need to know that DW isnt much different then those others mentionedI've never pointed to wins. Honestly skinsdad you are the main one that brings that up when it comes to Watson and Stafford yet make every excuse in the book when someone applies that metric to Kirk.
I'm not sure about them, but I always see you bring up the Vikings defense when it comes to Kirk, yet continously lead with W/L when it comes to Watson.nope i have maintained that wins arent a qb stat but the people who make cases for DW' somehow forget that . stafford is a borderline HOF qb and his wins and losses arent on him . no one says stafford chokes and if you are asking for 3 number ones , some number 2's and some core players then you need to know that DW isnt much different then those others mentioned
and please dont tell me that breed or dean r and others dont go straight to wins when talking about KC
Why would you give up assets for Carr? His playoff wins? None. His playoff appearances? None until now and quite frankly, if it were not for a GAWD AWFUL Chargers defense he would still have no playoff appearances. While he a viable option as you state, the assets to be given up are not worth the return. Will Carr really be made available or will Mariota be made available?Id give up assets for Carr. just don't know what would be fair or we could reasonably give without too much damage.
his arm talentWhy would you give up assets for Carr?
How many assets would you give, curious?his arm talent
I lead with that Watson wins stuff because of the debate against KC is wins and stat padding . Either you have a standard ( wins mean everything) or you don’t and if it’s used against KC then hell by their own standards I should be able to bring up their guys record .I'm not sure about them, but I always see you bring up the Vikings defense when it comes to Kirk, yet continously lead with W/L when it comes to Watson.
Grap didn’t take the 49ers anywhere . The team helped him along . Carr hasn’t played on as good a teams as Grap .Why would you give up assets for Carr? His playoff wins? None. His playoff appearances? None until now and quite frankly, if it were not for a GAWD AWFUL Chargers defense he would still have no playoff appearances. While he a viable option as you state, the assets to be given up are not worth the return. Will Carr really be made available or will Mariota be made available?
FACT: JG has taken his team to the playoffs more than Carr. The Raiders are not giving up Carr, they have viable replacement.Grap didn’t take the 49ers anywhere . The team helped him along . Carr hasn’t played on as good a teams as Grap .
That being said I think it will cost too much for either guy on one year deals
The 49ers have a better team and more stability at HCFACT: JG has taken his team to the playoffs more than Carr. The Raiders are not giving up Carr, they have viable replacement.
The answer I expected.The 49ers have a better team and more stability at HC
The Raiders changed coaches mid season and made the PO. Never been done since what, 1912, lol. What has Kyle Shannahan ever won? I will admit, he is a good play caller, I'll give you that.The 49ers have a better team and more stability at HC
He has been to a couple of super bowls as a HC and OCThe Raiders changed coaches mid season and made the PO. Never been done since what, 1912, lol. What has Kyle Shannahan ever won? I will admit, he is a good play caller, I'll give you that.
He has a losing record as HC but did win the NFC once. I believe his collapse on offense in half #2 as the OC cost ATL a super bowl. That's what Kyle has done. I would never want him back as our HC because his dad is a dolt and they left a stain on the legacy of REDSKINS.He has been to a couple of super bowls as a HC and OC
Im not hating on Cali, but if im raiders brass, the last thing I'm doing is trading Carr, he's cheap on the cap, had an amazing start to the season, and was a true leader despite tragedy and distraction. I can't believe im gonna say this, but Mayock sucks at his job, at least in the draft. The raiders should be waaaay better than they are. Trading carr for payne and a 1st would be illogicalHow many assets would you give, curious?
And, you are the Raiders GM, would you really make Carr available? What is your backup plan to replace him, Mariota?