- Thread starter
- #1
This has been a big topic on ESPN since the Freeh report has come out.
No, but it has nothing to do with Sandusky. I'd want my kids to go to a better school, and if not, i'd like them to go to a school in a cultural hub, not some podunk town.
And, if you happen to get a high powered lawyer job in Philadelphia, with the law degree that you do not yet have, and your child wants to go to PSU, and feels it is the best fit for him/her?
Your intellectual elitism is through the fucking roof for someone who still hasn't accomplished anything in life. LOL.
![]()
And, if you happen to get a high powered lawyer job in Philadelphia, with the law degree that you do not yet have, and your child wants to go to PSU, and feels it is the best fit for him/her?
Your intellectual elitism is through the fucking roof for someone who still hasn't accomplished anything in life. LOL.
![]()
Let's see, if they are 18 they can do as they want according to the law. How could you stop them if they are set on going there?
Let's see, if they are 18 they can do as they want according to the law. How could you stop them if they are set on going there?
If my child truly feels it is the best fit for them for a reason they can clearly articulate, fine. I just have a really negative opinion of "college towns."
When I talk to my friends who have gone to a variety of different schools, the gap between people who go to school in college towns and those who go to school in real cities is clearly apparent. The college town bunch do not know how to entertain themselves while sober, all their stories are the same (I did some stupid things while drunk....i'm so special), and they just aren't as well rounded as individuals. It isn't about elitism or intellectualism. It's about humanity, and whether a person can enjoy themselves without being self-destructive.
If my child truly feels it is the best fit for them for a reason they can clearly articulate, fine. I just have a really negative opinion of "college towns."
When I talk to my friends who have gone to a variety of different schools, the gap between people who go to school in college towns and those who go to school in real cities is clearly apparent. The college town bunch do not know how to entertain themselves while sober, all their stories are the same (I did some stupid things while drunk....i'm so special), and they just aren't as well rounded as individuals. It isn't about elitism or intellectualism. It's about humanity, and whether a person can enjoy themselves without being self-destructive.
If my child truly feels it is the best fit for them for a reason they can clearly articulate, fine. I just have a really negative opinion of "college towns."
When I talk to my friends who have gone to a variety of different schools, the gap between people who go to school in college towns and those who go to school in real cities is clearly apparent. The college town bunch do not know how to entertain themselves while sober, all their stories are the same (I did some stupid things while drunk....i'm so special), and they just aren't as well rounded as individuals. It isn't about elitism or intellectualism. It's about humanity, and whether a person can enjoy themselves without being self-destructive.
When I talk to my friends who have gone to a variety of different schools, the gap between people who go to school in college towns and those who go to school in real cities is clearly apparent. The college town bunch do not know how to entertain themselves while sober, all their stories are the same (I did some stupid things while drunk....i'm so special), and they just aren't as well rounded as individuals. It isn't about elitism or intellectualism. It's about humanity, and whether a person can enjoy themselves without being self-destructive.
Sounds like elitism to me. You are basically saying that the only good education comes from living in large metro areas.
It has nothing to do with education. It has everything to do with how one entertains themselves and what values an individual has. I do think that there is something intrinsically better about cities with better cuisines, better museums, better music venues, more sporting events, more street life, prettier geography, etc. In a city like Madison or Minneapolis or Chicago or Washington DC or New York or Austin, TX, or Columbus, or Ann Arbor (the list goes on and on), you have everything you could do in a State College or a Champaign, and much, much more.
I guess one could claim it is elitism, but only in the most rudimentary manner. I don't think it is that crazy to suggest that having more options is worthwhile.