Would You Choose Jamison Or Odom

[OutlawImmortal]

What did he do in the other 3 games?

Just curious

That wasn't during the playoffs, that was when Odom was with Dallas. Odom didn't play well against Dallas, but no one did. You don't get swept because of 1 player having a bad series. Odom played well in the first round that year.

 

[Hornsstampede2.0]

ODOM was a critical piece of the second kobe-Phil run.

They were so dominant because they could always put at least 1 of their 3 7 footers on the court.

Worse still, Odom could roam away from the rim a little bit and make things impossible. But, he was strong enough to dominate the boards at times.

Nobody else in the West could match their size.

And Odom was arguably the trickiest and most versatile of the 3 Laker big men.

It is sad that he is now a crack-head, but the Lakers don't come close to winning in 2009/2010 without Odom.

He was far more frustrating to play against than any other Laker from a Spurs perspective.

He might not always have been on his game, but when he was on, he was arguably their best player thanks to his versatility.

He was 10,000 times a better player than Jamison. Jamison is a classic stat padder for bad teams.

 

[trojanfan12]

ODOM was a critical piece of the second kobe-Phil run.

They were so dominant because they could always put at least 1 of their 3 7 footers on the court.

Worse still, Odom could roam away from the rim a little bit and make things impossible. But, he was strong enough to dominate the boards at times.

Nobody else in the West could match their size.

And Odom was arguably the trickiest and most versatile of the 3 Laker big men.

It is sad that he is now a crack-head, but the Lakers don't come close to winning in 2009/2010 without Odom.

He was far more frustrating to play against than any other Laker from a Spurs perspective.

He might not always have been on his game, but when he was on, he was arguably their best player thanks to his versatility.

He was 10,000 times a better player than Jamison. Jamison is a classic stat padder for bad teams.

Absolutely spot on!! Close thread!!

 

[True Lakers Fan]

ODOM was a critical piece of the second kobe-Phil run.

They were so dominant because they could always put at least 1 of their 3 7 footers on the court.

Worse still, Odom could roam away from the rim a little bit and make things impossible. But, he was strong enough to dominate the boards at times.

Nobody else in the West could match their size.

And Odom was arguably the trickiest and most versatile of the 3 Laker big men.

It is sad that he is now a crack-head, but the Lakers don't come close to winning in 2009/2010 without Odom.

He was far more frustrating to play against than any other Laker from a Spurs perspective.

He might not always have been on his game, but when he was on, he was arguably their best player thanks to his versatility.

He was 10,000 times a better player than Jamison. Jamison is a classic stat padder for bad teams.

I have never disputed this - but all of you seem to be intentionally ignoring the most obvious or perhaps some of you don't have the iq to understand that I am not talking about what Lamar did or was capable of right now for this season. Right now I would take Jamison because I haven't seen Lamar do anything the last two seasons if not three. Lamar was a better player then Jamison, but as of right now Lamar is not a better anything.