Game Thread: Wisconsin v South Carolina Cap One Bowl

[pumpkinhead33793]

Lol, what a meltdown.

 

[Smart]

Well other than that fuckface troll pumpkinhead, I think today has proven that the SEC and B1G aren't THAT far apart. This was a pretty close game to anyone that watched it.

If he was making fun of our team as a whole, fine. But he actually tried to blame our rushing offense on a day where we had 300 rushing yards on almost 7 YPC. I don't understand why he is still on this site.

 

[BigAppleBadger]

Shaw was 22/25 passing. Holy shit.

Ima make another whiskey drink.

 

[Golden Spur]

Spurrier is such a douche.

 

[BigAppleBadger]

If he was making fun of our team as a whole, fine. But he actually tried to blame our rushing offense on a day where we had 300 rushing yards on almost 7 YPC. I don't understand why he is still on this site.

He's an NFL fan that tries to post in the CFB forum, and seems to troll Wisconsin threads in particular. Hence not realizing that running on 3rd and 1 is better than passing if you're in the no huddle and need to score.

 

[ericd7633]

Well other than that fuckface troll pumpkinhead, I think today has proven that the SEC and B1G aren't THAT far apart. This was a pretty close game to anyone that watched it.

B1G had the benefit of better match ups though.

B1G #3 vs. SEC #4
B1G #4 vs. SEC #6
B1G #5 vs. SEC #5.

 

[pumpkinhead33793]

If he was making fun of our team as a whole, fine. But he actually tried to blame our rushing offense on a day where we had 300 rushing yards on almost 7 YPC. I don't understand why he is still on this site.

Because it is predictable and you exhaust all your offensive energy in the trenches by the end of the game. Then when a good defense and or a team with good coaching NEEDS to stop you, they almost will. This was evident today and turned the momentum around again. Finally, teams that rely almost solely on rushing don't have the cookies to perform a 2 minute drill when they need it late in games vs good teams.

 

[BigAppleBadger]

B1G had the benefit of better match ups though.

B1G #3 vs. SEC #4
B1G #4 vs. SEC #6
B1G #5 vs. SEC #5.

#19 Wisconsin vs #9 South Carolina
NR Iowa vs #14 LSU
NR Nebraska vs #22 Georgia

Come again?

 

[BigAppleBadger]

Because it is predictable and you exhaust all your offensive energy in the trenches by the end of the game. Then when a good defense and or a team with good coaching NEEDS to stop you, they almost will. This was evident today and turned the momentum around again. Finally, teams that rely almost solely on rushing don't have the cookies to perform a 2 minute drill when they need it late in games vs good teams.

Are you trying to argue that a strong running game wears out the OFFENSE by the end of the game?

If so then this is totally groundbreaking football theory.

 

[pumpkinhead33793]

He's an NFL fan that tries to post in the CFB forum, and seems to troll Wisconsin threads in particular. Hence not realizing that running on 3rd and 1 is better than passing if you're in the no huddle and need to score.

They were against the clock and would need to put the ball in the endzone anyway. South Carolina was expecting the run on 3rd and 1 so it was opportunistic to take the shot then. Like I said, you were fucked anyway because your pass offense sucks. Yeah even with Stave

 

[Runeman]

Conner shaw was the difference...what a gamer.

 

[Golden Spur]

Well, 33-6 over 3 seasons. Third straight top 10 finish. Beat Mizzou, Clemson, UCF, Wisco. I'm still pissed about the Tennessee game, and missing the SECCG, but overall, pretty good year.

 

[pumpkinhead33793]

#19 Wisconsin vs #9 South Carolina
NR Iowa vs #14 LSU
NR Nebraska vs #22 Georgia

Come again?

Because number 5 SEC is better than number 3 Big Ten. No matter what the matchups would favor SEC

 

[ericd7633]

#19 Wisconsin vs #9 South Carolina
NR Iowa vs #14 LSU
NR Nebraska vs #22 Georgia

Come again?

What does ranking have to do with it? If you line up the two conferences the B1G had the higher finishing team in terms of standing in 2 of the 3 games and it was even in the other. It's not the SEC's fault that the teams further down in the SEC standings are ranked better than the higher teams in terms of standing for the B1G are.

In other words the B1G benefits from missing out on SEC #3.

 

[pumpkinhead33793]

Are you trying to argue that a strong running game wears out the OFFENSE by the end of the game?

If so then this is totally groundbreaking football theory.

It wears out the more inferior team more. So in this case yes.

 

[BigAppleBadger]

This is also the first game Wisconsin has lost by more than a score since October 2010. Haven't lost by more than 10 since 2009 season.

 

[UNA Lion]

This is also the first game Wisconsin has lost by more than a score since October 2010. Haven't lost by more than 10 since 2009 season.

Good grief, that's impressive.

 

[BigAppleBadger]

It wears out the more inferior team more. So in this case yes.

That makes no fucking sense.

If our offensive line was "inferior" to their D-line, they wouldn't have almost 300 rushing yards.

Wisconsin lost this game because of a) turnovers and b) a missed FG (and another missed opportunity for a FG).

 

[pumpkinhead33793]

And the offensive line wore out late and worse the running backs.

 

[bocomo007]

This is also the first game Wisconsin has lost by more than a score since October 2010. Haven't lost by more than 10 since 2009 season.

great stat

that is impressive