lol....Stop sucking dick.
You mean like how Penn State was ranked higher than Michigan State after losing to them and they had the same record? It happens all the time.Even if ND were to lose to Syracuse , there is no way Michigan can jump ND at least not in a rational world. Number of losses being the same, head to head is the only fair tie breaker.
If there is one fan base that doesn’t get to pull the “join a conference” card with ND, it Michigan’s. And there’s plenty of history as to why that is.lol....
Well, the price of not being in one is if you lose to Syracuse, you're out.
You're practically in the ACC, it would benefit ND greatly to make that official.If there is one fan base that doesn’t get to pull the “join a conference” card with ND, it Michigan’s. And there’s plenty of history as to why that is.
But Michigan ALMOST beat Notre Dame. Quit hating.
No it wouldn’t — they’d be a sacrificial lamb to Clemson.You're practically in the ACC, it would benefit ND greatly to make that official.
LSU beat Georgia, still better than almost beating a team. Fail to the failures, #LifeTimeContract.Exactly. Just like LSU ALMOST beat Florida and ALM......who are we kidding — they got embarrassed by Bama. Quit hating.
the fact we haven’t won there since the twin towers were standing.
Why? It's something that most people look at and remember where they were and how long ago it was. Odd to get so triggered about referencing it in history.Odd thing to use as a chronological landmark. You know most of the folks on tHoop are American, right?
See, it is not a rational world. Syracuse beats ND, ND beats Michigan, so in the irrational world Michigan must be better than ND.Gotta look at the whole resume.
Up until last week, Florida and Kentucky had the same record, and Kentucky beat Florida by 11 in Gainesville, but Florida was the higher ranked team, and LSU was ranked higher than Florida despite having the same record and losing head to head to Florida.
Why? It's something that most people look at and remember where they were and how long ago it was. Odd to get so triggered about referencing it in history.
You must get pissed when people say how many championships Michigan has won since WWII.
What other major national event would you like me to have referenced that happened around 2001?I'm not triggered at all, dipshit.
From a writing standpoint, it's odd to use a historical reference that is viewed very negatively by your intended audience.
the fact we haven’t won there since the two towers were standing.
What other major national event would you like me to have referenced that happened around 2001?
We shouldn’t be looking past Rutgers. Once any team loses focus, someone’s gonna knock them on their ass.
What other major national event would you like me to have referenced that happened around 2001?
That was 2000....had it been one cycle longer I could have since "since Y2K"2001? The beginning of the new millennium.
Look, I don't really give a shit what you use. I was just trying to help you be a better writer. Consider your audience.