Oh and he doesn't resort to calling people names eitherand watch dipshits like you continue to call him the most valuable guy on the team
I'm not joking. Are you seriously this desperate? Really pathetic to make this many strawmans.
I never asserted that.
You should literally quit the forum after this. Wow... I don't know how you can show yourself here after this. lol
If you were intentionally trolling, you could not be more intellectually dishonest. I know frustration and emotion can consume some people, though.
OMG OMG OMG!!!! THE TRUTH HAS COME OUT, GUYS!!!!
Welcome to the club it's Dirt's M.O.Yes, the one post which agrees with you, is the ONE that counts. What a coincidence...
I mean, my goodness dude. lol
Also, is anyone here saying that the Jack play was called correctly?
It's just tough man, I'm just leveling with you here. You're all over the place. I can't keep up with each angle you take. You keep changing how you attack the arguement.
Dirt's tv has a different angle then the rest of AmericaI see Jack strip the ball before Lewis hits the ground... Therefore, Jacksonville ball. Isn't that what most people see?
Dirt's tv has a different angle then the rest of America
Your point? Notice in the next paragraph I say it was a 50/50 call. It could've went either way and the ruling on the field would've remained. No whinning just an opinion like I paraphrased it. It certainly wasn't clear cut or obvious prior to replay as some would have you believe.Ahem ^^^^^
We've already discussed most of this. I'm not doing the Dirt two step with you so you can tap dance around for another 8 hours as you keep adding and adding to the arguement.Which penalty by the Pats did you enjoy most not being called?
Was it the 2 different muggings of Mercedes Lewis?
Was it the blatant hold on the game ending Dion Lewis run?
Was it the post play Amendola headbut?
To answer your question, the only 2 calls I had a problem with was the PI before the half and the Jack whistle....But these arent your normal calls, these were game changing, SB representative changing calls that should not have happened
Agreed. No wonder the line opened up at -5.5.LOL - well done!
I agree after seeing the replay.recovery doesn't happen until nobody is touching Jack.
NWPATSFAN for one (Ignore his now jumping in to say the opposite)
SonnyBlack
RexRacer
Etc.etc.etc.etc.......
I agree after seeing the replay.
What's funny is Dirt also claimed he knew immediately (or words to that affect) that Lewis had fumbled. I say impossible from the live angle we saw.
So you agree then? He was likely blowing the whistle because Lewis was down. He didn't see the ball moving or come out. He saw Lewis with the ball, go down, blew the whistle then saw Jack with the ball.And I'd agree the guy that blew the whistle didn't have the best look at it, but he has to know that if you're unsure you let the play go on and automatic replay will sort out the turnover.
So you agree then? He was likely blowing the whistle because Lewis was down. He didn't see the ball moving or come out. He saw Lewis with the ball, go down, blew the whistle then saw Jack with the ball.
case closed
Sucked for the Jags I agree. The rest is speculation.I can't disagree thats what he saw from his angle, but if he saw Jack come up with the ball, why is he blowing the whistle?
I'm just joking that it was intentional... just sucked donkey balls for the Jags that he most likely scores and puts the game away.