Stop your bullshit. You didn't call Bosa out but called LeBron out. So when a white athlete has a political stance you agree with it's okay but when a black athlete does the same thing you have a problem because he's not on your side. Hypocrite much?
I guess you could actually read the posts, but you’d rather blindly hate a random guy on the internet.
(1)Why does it have to be about race? Is it not okay to disagree with a player's politics if they're black?
Lebron is arguably the most prominent and well-known athlete in the world...he also happens to be one of the most outspoken athletes when it comes to politics and social issues. A lot of people disagree with him on those topics and a lot of people agree with him.
Are people who disagree with him, not allowed to respond if they disagree with something he says/posts?
1. It was my bad for not paying attention to his mention of O'Neal, @tlance pointed that out. Kinda skipped over that not really knowing who he was.
The reason I said something in the first place is he's been know to talk-shit about LeBron in the past.
That is so interesting and surely applicable to the entire NBA watching publicEverytime I put an nba game on it’s the 76ers playing without embiid or the lakers playing without Lebron. It’s stupid. I used to follow the bulls religiously during the Kirk Hinrich and Tyson chandler years. I’d even follow the playoffs when the bulls weren’t involved. Now I might put it on because everything else on television sucks, but I’m usually not even interested and doing something else.
To be fair...who hasn't talked shit about Lebron in the past? Dude makes posts that bring it on himself sometimes.
Hell, even Wiggy has talked shit about Lebron when he was still a Cav. lol
You are 1 to 2 years behind with this argumentEverytime I put an nba game on it’s the 76ers playing without embiid or the lakers playing without Lebron. It’s stupid. I used to follow the bulls religiously during the Kirk Hinrich and Tyson chandler years. I’d even follow the playoffs when the bulls weren’t involved. Now I might put it on because everything else on television sucks, but I’m usually not even interested and doing something else.
Oh, are players not sitting out anymore?You are 1 to 2 years behind with this argument
Not nearly like they were no. The 65 game requirement has made a lot of difference.Oh, are players not sitting out anymore?
Still gives them 17 games to sit out…Not nearly like they were no. The 65 game requirement has made a lot of difference.
It’s not really happening, there are certainly injuries though.Still gives them 17 games to sit out…
Then, I guess people stopped caring about a league in which the players don’t want to play because they are tired.It’s not really happening, there are certainly injuries though.
Next year SGA will be the first player to make $80 million. The salaries only go up if profits are up. Get back to me when salaries start down.Then, I guess people stopped caring about a league in which the players don’t want to play because they are tired.
Cool.Next year SGA will be the first player to make $80 million. The salaries only go up if profits are up. Get back to me when salaries start down.
I think it is more applicable than you believe. Do you actually sit down and watch a 3.5 hour college football game, for example, in real time(commercials and all)? Do people still do this without DVRs? I don’t have the attention span or the time for this kind of commitment anymore.That is so interesting and surely applicable to the entire NBA watching public
I think it is more applicable than you believe. Do you actually sit down and watch a 3.5 hour college football game, for example, in real time(commercials and all)? Do people still do this without DVRs? I don’t have the attention span or the time for this kind of commitment anymore.
Narrow the lane