not one.. not two.. not three..
that wasnt a prediction, that was a mother fucking threat.
not one.. not two.. not three..
that wasnt a prediction, that was a mother fucking threat.
So now it was "tongue in cheek"!! It's only taken Heat fans almost 4 years to add THAT excuse to the list!!
I suppose when Lebron and D-Wade were making fun of Nowitzki being sick, that was "tongue in cheek" too!!![]()
Is that how you interpreted that? That's cute.
The 2012 & 2013 Heat lost 7 games while the 98 Bulls lost 6 games (remember the first round was shorter back then) and the Heat win % in 2012 & 2013 was higher than the 98 Bulls in the playoffs. The 1992 Bulls went 15-7
The 2000 Lakers went 15-7 while the 2009 & 2010 Lakers had the same exact postseason record as the 2012 & 2013 Heat which was 16-7.
Basically the Bulls teams were more dominant than the Heat outside of the 98 Bulls but the Lakers were only dominant in 2 of their 5 titles. In their other 3 titles they either had a lower winning % or the same winning % in the playoffs as the 2012 & 2013 Heat
The Pacers quite obviously will face the mighty Wizards in the Eastern Conference Finals... might even sneak away with a series win if the ball bounces their way. And the Heat have to get their rings NOW before the inevitable Wiz Dynasty.. can't blame them at all for gettin' it while the gettins good.
(lol... hey, gotta trump the team.. gotta be me)
On a serious note, it's still hard for me to back away from the Spurs as the team the Pacers meet should they get to the NBA Finals. Everytime I count the Spurs out as too slow, or too old, or too this-and-that, they find a way to surprise me. Out there in the wild wild west... who the hell knows?It'll probably all boil down to who has the hot hand and momentum in June.. no matter what their record or seeding.
Actually, going back to the original topic, the "mother fucking threat" are the Indiana Pacers now.
And its got the poor little heat fans running scared.
Also, you honestly think someone is a dick for having a party and celebrating?
People in this world are WAY to sensitive. I wouldnt care if the Lakers had a party after Gasol. I dont get why anyone would. Thinking people were dicks for having parties.. ive heard it all.
![]()
They haven't backed it up though. It was not 1, not 2, not 3.....all the way to what? 7? 8? And they didn't even win it in the 1st season together.
Looks like they're going to fall pretty far short of that 7 or 8 thing too. They're going to have enough trouble getting the 3rd.
You can talk percentages all you want: Spurs don't mess up a 5 point lead with less than 30 seconds to go and/or Kawhi Leonard makes that free throw and the story would be completely different. THAT'S what I mean with Spurs lost it; the Heat didn't win it.
You can talk percentages all you want: Spurs don't mess up a 5 point lead with less than 30 seconds to go and/or Kawhi Leonard makes that free throw and the story would be completely different. THAT'S what I mean with Spurs lost it; the Heat didn't win it.
Might as well give the Pacers their trophy now
I guess you base your life on if's. They might of lost it, but they sure didn't win it. Really the only thing that matters in the end...if only...
![]()
Oh cool.. the 16 title thing again. Is that the default argument when laker fans start making no sense? Cool you have 16 titles.. some from the 40s/50s and in Minneapolis. 11 from before Miami was even a franchise. Congrats. You won the argument over which team has the most titles.. which wasnt being argued. But you won it.
IF derek fisher and robert horry aren't clutch how many rings do the lakers have?
Isn't if fun how laker fans forget that but then bring up the Heat being clutch?
I'd bet any amount of vCash you've never heard the name Grant Long.
I'd bet any amount of vCash you've never heard the name Grant Long.