NickTheGreek
New Member
I think the thought is that if they pay Lynch then they won't have the money for Wilson. Either that or they are trying to show why Wilson is more important to the team than that of Lynch (probably this one). There have been quite a few on here (myself included) that think Lynch is the bigger threat on offense than that of Wilson. I like both players and think they both contribute like crazy to the team but if I was a coach I would rather force Wilson to beat me than that of Lynch. I would rather load up the box and dare Wilson to throw and see what happens. Now yes Wilson has shown he does just fine when that happens. The question becomes though how much does not having Lynch in the offense actually hurt the offense? He is what allows a lot of the play action and teams delaying a bit on any kind of pressure because of the fear of the run. I just think teams game plan a bit more on how to stop Lynch than Wilson at this point.
I thought so, too, until I saw the SB. Wilson is great and can carry that team with weapons. Denver focused on stopping Lynch which opened up early Jet sweeps to Harvin. Then you fake to Harvin and it opens up the passing game.
At some point, Lynch is going to slow down. There would be a drop off at RB but don't sleep on Christine Michael. He can be an "adequate" replacement. As soon as Russell Wilson is asked to carry Seattle, I see him doing it with these weapons.
Didn't Wilson throw for almost 400 yds vs Atlanta a couple of years ago in the playoffs when they were down by 3 td's? I believe so.
![Noidea :noidea: :noidea:](/images/smilies2/noidea.gif)
The kid is much better than fans think and I haven't seen any tape from the playoffs that says he can't carry Seattle and make all the NFL throws with upper echelon decision making.