Laserman
New Member
They wouldn't be willing to eat enough of that contract to make it worth my while, not that they have to make it worth my while
Just depends on how much they would eat?
They wouldn't be willing to eat enough of that contract to make it worth my while, not that they have to make it worth my while
Just depends on how much they would eat?
Add James Shields to the mix. According to mlbtraderumors:
The Angels aren’t the only team in pursuit of James Shields. The Rangers and Dodgers have also made the Rays trade offers for the right-hander, Danny Knobler of CBSSports.com reports.
No thanks, he's just not that good, unless he can be had for cheap, which I doubt
But he is a workhorse
Didn't he finish 3rd in the CY voting last season?
Have you looked at his numbers this year, or the year before last, or the year before that?
Last season looks like the outlier, and I could care less what he did last year, it has ZERO bearing on this year
CAREER:
80 wins, 69 losses, 16 CG, 6 SHO's, 4.00 ERA.
not the best but not bad.
CAREER:
80 wins, 69 losses, 16 CG, 6 SHO's, 4.00 ERA.
not the best but not bad.
Big no to "Big Game James". We don't need to give up prospects for that Jersey Shore wannabe. I still remember him acting like a clown from the top steps of the dugout and mocking the Rangers players in the ALDS in 2010. He's an innings-eater with above average stuff, nothing more. We already have 3-4 pitchers who are just as good or better.
Rangers need a true proven ace who can take the ball in a decisive game or else they should just stick with what they have now.
Any pitcher with a career 4.00 era is no ace. We don't need to be giving up prospects for a pitcher who's "not bad". We need an ace or stand pat. I swear you just want Texas to make a move for the sake of making a move.
CAREER:
80 wins, 69 losses, 16 CG, 6 SHO's, 4.00 ERA.
not the best but not bad.
Would love for LAA to spend their talent to get Shields. He's 3-2 with a 4.11ERA against TEX in Arlington.
They get him they also pick up his $9MM and $12MM options for 2013 and 14. Think he's worth that money as a #4?
No i don't want the team to make a move just to make a move, i want the team to continue on with what they've accomplished the last 2 seasons not say "well we made it to the WS 2 years in a row so we can stand still and be happy".
but you're right let's not do anything, hang onto to all our "prospects" and wait for that "ACE" to come along and fall into our lap.
btw, i am not pushing for Shields all i did was add the note that the Rangers had add him to their list of pitchers they were interested in.
Rangers are only rumored for Shields to drive up his price... IMO.
nope but then again i don't think that any player is worth the millions they earn.
like i said in my previous post: i only posted that the Rangers had added him to their pitchers of interest and then posted his record as an after thought.
Do i think the Rangers need a 4th pitcher to complement Holland, Darvish & Harrison? YES and i don't believe Oswalt, Feldman or Perez fill that bill. and Ogando is not ready to be stretched out.
I never said lets not do anything. I've pushed hard for cliff lee. There's no sense in making a lateral move though and you seem to think a lateral move is better than no move at all.