- Thread starter
- #1
PhilSimms11
Well-Known Member
AFC
(1)KC (12-4)*
(2)LAC (12-4)
(6)IND (10-6) @ (3)NE (11-5)*
(5)BAL (10-6)* @ (4)HOU (11-5)*
-----
NFC
(1)NO (13-3)*
(2)LAR (13-3)*
(6)PHI (9-7) @ (3)CHI (12-4)*
(5)DAL (10-6)* @ (4)SEA (10-6)
(*)won division
KC< LAC--better division record (5-1 to 4-2)
NE< HOU--HTH
BAL< IND--better conference record (8-4 to 7-5)
-----
NO< LAR--HTH
SEA< DAL--HTH
To avoid confusion the (<) is pointing to the team seeded higher.
What would this look like just for fun? Take the 6 teams from each conference and seed them 1-12.
(1)NO (13-3)*
(2)LAR (13-3)*
(3)KC (12-4)*
(4)CHI (12-4)*
(12)PHI (9-7) @ (5)LAC (12-4)
(11)IND (10-6) @ (6)NE (11-5)*
(10)DAL (10-6)* @ (7)HOU (11-5)*
(9)SEA (10-6) @ (8)BAL (10-6)*
(*)won division
(1)KC (12-4)*
(2)LAC (12-4)
(6)IND (10-6) @ (3)NE (11-5)*
(5)BAL (10-6)* @ (4)HOU (11-5)*
-----
NFC
(1)NO (13-3)*
(2)LAR (13-3)*
(6)PHI (9-7) @ (3)CHI (12-4)*
(5)DAL (10-6)* @ (4)SEA (10-6)
(*)won division
KC< LAC--better division record (5-1 to 4-2)
NE< HOU--HTH
BAL< IND--better conference record (8-4 to 7-5)
-----
NO< LAR--HTH
SEA< DAL--HTH
To avoid confusion the (<) is pointing to the team seeded higher.
What would this look like just for fun? Take the 6 teams from each conference and seed them 1-12.
(1)NO (13-3)*
(2)LAR (13-3)*
(3)KC (12-4)*
(4)CHI (12-4)*
(12)PHI (9-7) @ (5)LAC (12-4)
(11)IND (10-6) @ (6)NE (11-5)*
(10)DAL (10-6)* @ (7)HOU (11-5)*
(9)SEA (10-6) @ (8)BAL (10-6)*
(*)won division