saddles
No More "Bullpen Failure"
400 posts on this thread. I believe that is the 4th most this season.
Well, they don't have a top 100 prospect so might as well go after their top prospect, Kyle Muller. LolBraves need a SP and a LF..
Wonder what the Rangers could get for Perez & Calhoun..
Curious, what would y'all think about going after a guy like Joe Musgrove in the off-season, along with re-signing Perez?
In the offseason I would like to see us pursue the best pitcher who will sign here. Whether that is Perez, Musgrove or a better pitcher than either of them, I am fine with that.Curious, what would y'all think about going after a guy like Joe Musgrove in the off-season, along with re-signing Perez?
If you trade Perez then you will need to find another #1. Nothing gained.Braves need a SP and a LF..
Wonder what the Rangers could get for Perez & Calhoun..
If you trade Perez then you will need to find another #1. Nothing gained.
Perez is proven. Those ^^ have a way to go.See how Ragans and White do by August 2nd.
Cole Winn too.
Could get back a pitcher in the deal too.
I would offer Perez an extension, if he doesn’t sign, trade him for sure.
Perez is proven. Those ^^ have a way to go.
Have already said the same. But what if you trade perez and Calhoun as you ask'd above. You will have to aquire a replacement.That’s why I think we should offer him an extension.
If he doesn’t take an extension we should definitely trade him IMO. Not trading him would be bad for the future.
That’s why I think we should offer him an extension.
If he doesn’t take an extension we should definitely trade him IMO. Not trading him would be bad for the future.
what did the darvish, Cole Hamels, and Gibson trades really net us?
can anyone point to something tangible from those deals that is helping us in the farm system and likely to help us at the major league level? To be totally honest with you, I was stoked about the Lynn trade, but have since cooled on that one as well.
tradimg established pitchers for prospects isn’t what it used to be.
Pretty much every ranger fan unanimously agrees that the teixera trade and gallo trades were awesome, but those were position players.Depends I guess, the Mark Texeira trade was nice. The Gallo trade was nice. The Gibson trade not so much.
It can go a lot of different ways I suppose
I’ve yet to see a good trade where we give up a quality pitcher and bring back prospects who actually help us.
Even when they traded Darvish, his ERA was just over 4, so we couldn't get his true value.Other than the Darvish and Gibson trades, have the Rangers ever traded away a quality starting pitcher?
Lance Lynn and we got Dunning and Weems in exchangeOther than the Darvish and Gibson trades, have the Rangers ever traded away a quality starting pitcher?